Skip to content

Compliance Building

Doug Cornelius on compliance for private equity real estate

Menu
  • Home
  • About
    • About
    • About Doug
    • About This Website
    • Why I Blog
    • Speaking Engagements
    • Contact
    • Publications
  • Archives
    • Topic Archive
    • Book Reviews
    • Most Popular
  • Subscribe
  • Disclaimers
    • Disclaimers
    • Policies and Procedures
    • Use of Site Content
    • Comments
    • FTC Disclosure
Menu

The One with the Fake Pot Ownership

Posted on January 26, 2020January 23, 2020 by Doug Cornelius
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

With the growth of marijuana businesses across several states, many see it at a sector ripe for investment with the possibility of big returns. While states approve the sale of marijuana, it’s not entirely legal. Federal law still lists it as a controlled substance. That makes banking difficult and oversight difficult for investors. It also makes it a target for less than scrupulous middlemen.

That’s where we find Guy Griffitthe and Robert Russell. Mr. Russell and his wife had created a company in Washington that held a license to grow marijuana under the state’s recreational cannabis laws.

According to the SEC complaint, Russell cut a deal with Griffithe to offer a stake in his marijuana growing business. That was the first problem.

Under the Washington law for marijuana businesses, ownership is tightly controlled and regulated. Russell couldn’t sell an ownership interest without approval from the state Liquor and Cannabis Board. According to the complaint, Russell and Griffithe tried to structure it as a right to receive profits and not an ownership interest. I don’t think it worked.

That didn’t seem to stop Griffithe from selling interests in the company that bought the interest in the marijuana growing company. The pitch was that the investment would help the marijuana grower to expand by providing capital for equipment, land and physical facilities.

The next problem is that Griffithe didn’t register the securities for sale and didn’t make sure the sale was happening within an exemption. He used a website and openly advertised the sale of the securities.

The third problem was that they spent most of the $4.85 million they raised on non-business purchases. The SEC loves to list out the extravagant purchases made by fraudsters with their ill-gotten cash. This was no exception.

  • 2008 Bentley Continental
  • 2012 Mercedes Benz C Class
  • 2013 Ford Mustang (I’ll assume this was a Boss 302 or Shelby GT500 model)
  • 2015 Porsche Panamera
  • $250,000 towards a 65-foot Pacific Mariner yacht

The final straw was that the marijuana growing business was not actually profitable. According to the SEC, it never made a profit. Meanwhile Griffithe’s marketing material proclaimed a 40% profit margin. They faked the profitability by using some of the investor paid-in capital to make distributions. That turned it into a Ponzi scheme.

Fraudulent investment activity in marijuana business has become so widespread that the SEC has published an Investment Alert: Marijuana Investments and Fraud.

This case points out one of the shortcomings in that SEC alert. It fails to point out the very common limitation on changes of ownership in marijuana businesses. Even if the investment is legitimate, the likely requirement of approvals for the acquisition and later sale will have a big impact on the investment.

Sources:

  • SEC Files Charges Against Scheme to Sell Fictitious Interests in Marijuana Company
  • SEC Complaint
  • WeWork’s Valuation Was for WeWork; Also fake cannabis shares and swine arbitrage
  • SEC Investor Alert: Marijuana Investments and Fraud

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search for Stuff

Recent Stories

  • Model Fees Versus Actual Fees in Marketing
  • Compliance Bricks and Mortar for January 16
  • Staff Report on Capital-Raising Dynamics
  • Compliance Bricks and Mortar for January 9
  • “Small”: I Don’t Think You Know What That Means
  • CFTC is Saying Goodbye to Private Funds
  • New York’s LLC Transparency Act Will Remain Limited
  • SEC and CFTC With Only Republicans
  • Compliance Books from 2025
  • Happy New Year

Fight Cancer

Please support my Pan-Mass Challenge
Make a donation to fight cancer. donate.pmc.org/DC0176
pan-mass challenge badge

I am a lawyer, but I am not your lawyer. Since I’m a lawyer, this website may be considered attorney advertising under the ethical rules of certain jurisdictions. Please read my disclaimers page before taking any action. And then, don't take any action based on what I wrote.

Creative Commons logo with the text 'Some Rights Reserved' and three symbols representing attribution, non-commercial use, and share alike.

Compliance Building - by Doug Cornelius is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.