Compliance, the SEC and the Supreme Court

Continuing Lucia

After last week’s Supreme Court decision in Lucia v. Securities and Exchange Commission, it’s clear that administrative law judges of the US Securities and Exchange Commission are not mere federal employees but qualify as “Officers of the United States” under the Appointments Clause of the US Constitution. That means they need be appointed by the … Read more »

Bitcoins Are Not Securities

In a completely unsurprising statement, a high-ranking official at the Securities and Exchange Commission said that Bitcoins are not securities. William Hinman, Director, Division of Corporation Finance at the SEC, gave detailed speech on cryptocurrency. When we see that kind of economic transaction, it is easy to apply the Supreme Court’s “investment contract” test first … Read more »

Compliance, the SEC, and the Supreme Court

The SEC’s Administrative Law Judges are “Officers of the United States”

The Supreme Court issued its decision in Lucia v. Securities and Exchange Commission.  The problem is that the administrative law judges were appointed by an internal panel instead of by the President or the SEC Commissioners. The Appointments Clause of the Constitution is there to make sure that those who wield power are subject to “political … Read more »

Compliance Bricks and Mortar for June 15

These are some of the compliance-related stories that recently caught my attention. Is Over-Regulation Really the Reason There are Fewer IPOs? by Kevin LaCroix There is one aspect of Coffee’s analysis that in my mind warrants further consideration. In discussing the advantages for smaller companies of raising money through venture capital or private equity rather … Read more »