Veterans Day – Remember Those Who Serve

veterans day 2014

Raymond Weeks of Birmingham, Alabama, organized a Veterans Day parade for that city on November 11, 1947, to honor all of America’s Veterans for their loyal service. Later, U.S. Representative Edward H. Rees of Kansas proposed legislation changing the name of Armistice Day to Veterans Day to honor all who have served in America’s Armed Forces.

In 1954, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a bill proclaiming November 11th as Veterans Day and called upon Americans everywhere to rededicate themselves to the cause of peace. He issued a Presidential Order directing the head of the Veterans Administration, now the Department of Veterans Affairs, to form a Veterans Day National Committee to organize and oversee the national observance of Veterans Day.

Take a few minutes today to remember those who served.

9 11

"Tribute in Light" from the US Air Force
“Tribute in Light” from the US Air Force

The September 11 attacks resulted in the deaths of 2,977 victims. The victims included 246 on the four planes, 2,606 in New York City in the World Trade Center towers and on the ground, and 125 at the Pentagon. Nearly all of the victims were civilians. One was an employee of my company.

Make a few minutes today to remember those 2,977 lives lost directly, and the thousands more as a result of the subsequent military actions. Thousands more Americans were killed in Afghanistan to attack the perpetrators of 9-11.

Make a few more minutes to think about how our country has eroded some of it’s citizens’ civil liberties as a response to the threats, real or perceived, that come from terrorism. The NSA spying scandal, the TSA procedures at the airport, the militarization of our police forces, any many other negatives have spilled into America culture as a result of those 9-11 attacks. Think about how the Ferguson police force ended up with those tanks and surplus military equipment.

Compliance and the Tour de France

tour de france

For me, July starts with the red, white and blue, then quickly turns to yellow. The yellow jersey worn by the overall leader of the Tour de France.

I’ve been a big fan of the Tour de France for the past decade and a half. I admit that it was the success of Lance Armstrong that brought me to it. The dethroned champion taught us a few compliance lessons.

You can’t ignore the history of cheating in the Tour de France, just as you cannot ignore the steroid era of baseball. The cheaters were ahead of the organization’s will to enforce and ahead of the organization’s ability to catch the cheaters.

It now seems that cycling’s governing bodies are serious about keeping doping out of the sport. It also appears that the science of detection has caught up to the science of cheating. There is less disincentive to cheat if you think the chances of getting caught are remote. Mr. Armstrong was tested hundreds of times. The few times that an anomaly was spotted, it was washed away by the poor testing or whitewashed by the governing body.

You can’t have compliance if the rules are not backed by testing and enforcement.

If you like the watercolor above, there is a kickstarter project for a book of these paintings: Book de Tour. The artist, Greig Leach, painted that scene from the 2013 edition of the Tour de France and I purchased it from him. Mr. Leach is painting key scenes from the 2014 edition of the Tour de France and compiling them in Book de Tour. If you like cycling, it’s a great project to sponsor.

Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness

Declaration_independence

IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.–Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.
He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.
He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:
For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences
For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:
For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.
He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.
He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.
He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our Brittish brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.

The 56 signatures on the Declaration appear in the positions indicated:

Button Gwinnett
Lyman Hall
George Walton
William Hooper
Joseph Hewes
John PennEdward Rutledge
Thomas Heyward, Jr.
Thomas Lynch, Jr.
Arthur Middleton
John HancockSamuel Chase
William Paca
Thomas Stone
Charles Carroll of Carrollton

George Wythe
Richard Henry Lee
Thomas Jefferson
Benjamin Harrison
Thomas Nelson, Jr.
Francis Lightfoot Lee
Carter Braxton

Robert Morris
Benjamin Rush
Benjamin Franklin
John Morton
George Clymer
James Smith
George Taylor
James Wilson
George RossCaesar Rodney
George Read
Thomas McKean
William Floyd
Philip Livingston
Francis Lewis
Lewis MorrisRichard Stockton
John Witherspoon
Francis Hopkinson
John Hart
Abraham Clark
Josiah Bartlett
William WhippleSamuel Adams
John Adams
Robert Treat Paine
Elbridge Gerry

Stephen Hopkins
William Ellery

Roger Sherman
Samuel Huntington
William Williams
Oliver Wolcott

Matthew Thornton

Happy Patriots’ Day

patriots day compliance

The Redcoats are coming!
The Redcoats are coming!

Patriots’ Day is a Massachusetts state holiday commemorating the opening battles of the American Revolutionary War in Lexington and Concord in April, 1775.  The more modern day event is the running of the Boston Marathon, starting in Hopkinton and ending 26.2 miles later in Copley Square.

Last year’s marathon was horribly marred by two homicidal psychopaths. This marathon is being taken back this year.

In the morning there is a battle reenactment on the Lexington Green of the early-morning engagement between the town’s militia and the British regulars. If you remember back to U.S. history class, that battle was the shot heard round the world.

There is also a re-enactment of the rides of Paul Revere and William Dawes from Boston out to Lexington. (You don’t know about Hawes because Longfellow didn’t write a poem about him.) That ride started out with the “one if by land, two if by sea” signal to Charlestown in case Revere and Dawes were captured.

What does this have to do with compliance or business ethics? Nothing. It’s a holiday here in Massachusetts so I am out of the office.

Evacuation Day and Compliance

evacuation-day

March 17 is more known for that other holiday where everything is green. You night not be celebrating today if it were not for the events of 1776.

In 1776, British forces had occupied Boston for years. The local militia and Continental army had been harassing the British soldiers, leaving them isolated on the small peninsula that was Boston at the time.

In May of 1775 American forces had captured Fort Ticonderoga on Lake Champlain and its artillery. Colonel Henry Knox, Washington’s chief of artillery, suggested to General Washington that they bring the captured artillery to Boston. Knox and his men hauled tons of artillery over the rugged Berkshires, through swamps and along crude roads, for 300 miles.

Washington first placed some of the heavy cannons in Cambridge and Roxbury. They were effective to harass the British, but were merely a diversion. The batteries opened fire on the night of March 2. The British returned fire, without significant casualties on either side. The action was repeated on March 3.

It was repeated again on March 4. But this night was the true diversion. Troops marched to the top of Dorchester Heights hauling tools and cannon placements. Throughout the night the troops built earthworks overlooking Boston and the harbor. The artillery was in place to controll access to the city.

On the morning of March 5, the British saw the fortifications. It was a key date because March 5 was the sixth anniversary of the Boston Massacre.

Washington controlled the harbor and access by land to the Boston peninsula. The British were vulnerable and had to either flee or try to take back Dorchester Heights. British General Howe decided to preserve his army for battle elsewhere rather than attempt to hold Boston. Howe informed Washington that Boston would not be burned if his troops were allowed to leave unmolested.

After several days of preparation and several days of delay caused by bad weather, the British forces departed Boston on March 17 and sailed to Halifax. Hundreds of 1,000 loyalist fled Boston with the troops, afraid of the rebel forces.

This was the first major victory of the Revolutionary War. The citizens of Boston were not willing to comply with the British mandates. A city full of British soldiers was causing trouble, even for those were not keen on the rebellion.

Evacuation Day was declared a city holiday in 1901. The state made it a holiday in Suffolk County in 1938. Perhaps the large Irish population of Boston played a role in the establishment of the holiday that coincided with St. Patrick’s Day.

As you hoist a green beer today, remember this victory.

References:

Occupy Boston is Back…..

Occupy Boston - Not

No, it’s not.

“March 1st and March 2nd, NBC Studios will be in Norman B. Leventhal Park to film large crowd scenes for the pilot of their television series “Odyssey”. While filming will only be on the weekends, certain production work will take place during the week. Any set design or props in the Park are part of the “Odyssey” set.”

Apparently, the “crowd scenes” must be an Occupy Boston or Occupy Wall Street scene for the story.

Snow Shoveling and Compliance

snow and compliance

A winter storm has been hitting big chunks of the United States over the last few days. For me, in Boston, it’s just a small accumulation. That’s enough to cause a nuisance and snarl the morning commute.

For me, one test of compliance is snow shoveling. Did my neighbors shovel their sidewalks so people can pass safely?

I live in a neighborhood where there are lots of walkers. The elementary school is just down the street and most kids walk to school. Many people in the neighborhood walk to the nearby bus stops and train station for their commute into Boston. Property owners should clear their sidewalks. It’s the right thing to do.

Of course, being in the suburbs many people just drive everywhere. They think the strip of concrete between their house and the street is merely a place to put the barrels on trash-day. That potentially endangers pedestrians who may be forced into the street or may slip and fall on the uncleared sidewalk.

My town has contemplated enactment of shoveling ordinance, making it an offense if your sidewalk is not shoveled within 24 hours after the end of the storm. The ordinance would turn an ethics issue into a compliance issue.

What do you shovel first, your driveway or your sidewalk? What’s more important to you? To your neighbors?