The Summer 2008 newsletter from TRACE International provides some more background on FCPA Opinion Procedure Release 08-03. TRACE points out that this release was the first time that the DOJ has approved the payment of a specific dollar amount to government officials.
Category: Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
Even Rocket Scientists Get Caught Under The FCPA
Shu Quan-Sheng (Shu), 68, a native of China, naturalized U.S. citizen and Ph.D. physicist, entered a guilty plea before Judge Henry C. Morgan, Jr. in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Norfolk Division to charges that he illegally exported space launch technical data and defense services to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and offered bribes to Chinese government officials. Shu is the President, Secretary and Treasurer of AMAC International Inc., (AMAC), a high-tech company based in Newport News and that has offices in Beijing.
DOJ Pres Release:Virginia Physicist Pleads Guilty to Illegally Exporting Space Launch Data to China and Offering Bribes to Chinese Officials
Thanks to Richard Cassin of The FCPA Blog for pointing out this story: Rocket Scientist Pleads Guilty.
FCPA Presentation by Sheppard Mullin
Bethany Hengsbach of Sheppard Mullin published a slidedeck all about the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: The FCPA: What Our Clients Need to Know and Why They Need to Know it?
Treasury Issues Final Regulations for Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States
On November 14, 2008, the Department of the Treasury issued its final rule to implement the Foreign Investment and National Security Act of 2007, which provided guidelines for the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States when reviewing investments by foreign persons in U.S. businesses for national security issues.
The Foreign Investment and National Security Act of 2007 amended section 721 of the Defense Production Act of 1950 (50 USC §2170) authorizing the President to review merger, acquisitions and takeovers by or with any foreign person which could result in foreign control of any person engaged in interstate commerce in the United States to determine the effects of such transaction on the national security of the United States.
FINSA codifies the structure, role, process and responsibilities of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States. Previously, CFIUS had existed only by executive order. FINSA establishes CFIUS in statute.
On April 21, 2008, the Department of the Treasury issued proposed regulations for the CFIUS . You can also get the comments on the proposed CFIUS regulations.
The final regulations go into effect 30 days after publication in the Federal Register: Regulations Pertaining to Mergers, Acquisitions, and Takeovers by Foreign Persons. (.pdf) That means they should be in effect by the end of the year.
See my blog posts:
See also:
Metcalf & Eddy Settlement
This is a FCPA civil settlement between the United States of America and Metcalf & Eddy (.pdf). Metcalf & Eddy’s agreement in this settlement was to institute their FCPA Compliance Program. You can use the settlement as resource guide to what the government expects in compliance programs pertaining to FCPA. Click here to download the PDF.
Courtesy of the Society of Corporate Compliance and Ethics.
Legal Expenses
Mark A. Srere and Amy J. Conway-Hatcher of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP wrote Legal Expenses for The Recorder (CAL LAW). The article compares the results of U.S. Department of Justice and SEC investigation against Lucent with FCPA Opinion Procedure Release 08-03.
Lucent spent millions of dollars on hundreds of trips for Chinese government officials over a three year period. The trips were primarily sightseeing and leisure activities, including Disneyland, Niagra Falls and the Grand Canyon. Lucent also labeled the attendees as “decision-makers” who could help award new business to the company. See The FCPA Blog’s post on Lucent.
TRACE International under FCPA Opinion Procedure Release 08-03 was merely paying out of pocket costs for journalists to cover the company’s news stories. Local journalists got lunch money and local transportation costs. Out-of-town journalists got some extra travel expenses and more meals.
TRACE tied the payments to expenses directly related to the “promotion, demonstration or explanation of the company’s products or services” and were reasonable in amount. Lucent failed both of these tests under 15 U.S.C. § 78dd-2(c)(2)(A).
Siemens Reserves $1.3 Billion to Settle Corruption Charges
The German conglomerate Siemens has set aside $1.3 billion to settle an ongoing corruption investigation according to CFO.com: Siemens Reserves $1.3 Billion for Probe.
Back in April, international law firm Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, hired by Siemens to investigate bribery and corruption charges dating back to the late 1990s, found evidence of violations of domestic and foreign compliance regulations. Its report said many of the violations were due both to corruption and violations of regulations that govern internal controls and the accuracy of documentation.That report, delivered to the German conglomerate’s compliance committee, covered business transactions between 1999 and 2006, and management conduct related to those practices
Ignorance Is No Excuse When It Comes to the FCPA
Paul R. Berger, Bruce E. Yannett, Erin W. Sheehy, and Emily S. Pierce of Debevoise & Plimpton LLP wrote an article: Fair Warning: Ignorance Is No Excuse When it Comes to the FCPA (March 2008).
The article focused on some of the implications of Unites States V. Kay, 513 F.3d 432. [See Kay v. United States and Kay – Certiorari Denied]. The authors point out that one of the defendant defenses was that they did not have fair notice that bribes paid to reduce taxes and levies violated the FCPA.
The article also points out that there have been several prosecutions under the FCPA’s book and records requirement even when bribery could not be proven.
They also highlight the guidance from the DOJ about what are acceptable travel and entertainment expenses. They summarize FCPA Opinion Release 2007-01 and FCPA Opinion Release 2007-02 as providing these factors that made the proposed travel acceptable:
- the foreign officials making the trip were not selected by the company and had no direct authority over decisions relating to potential contracts or licenses necessary to operate in the foreign country;
- the expenses would be limited – no international airfare and economy class domestic airfare; no entertainment or leisure (although a “modest four-hour city sightseeing tour” was acceptable); no stipends; reimbursement for incidental expenses up to “a modest daily minimum, upon presentation of a written receipt”; no expenses for spouse, family or guests; and souvenirs limited to company-branded items of nominal value;
- the company would pay all incurred expenses directly to the service providers (not to the officials) and properly record such payments in its books and records; and
- the company received a written legal opinion that the trips did not violate the laws of the home country of the foreign official.
The authors point out that the best defense against FCPA is to have a robust compliance program in place that includes written policies, procedures, training and testing through internal audits.
Sovereign Wealth Funds That Are Part of the IWG and Santiago Principles
The following sovereign wealth funds are part of the Internal Working Group of Soverign Wealth Funds and the Santiago Principles:
Australia
The Future Fund
Azerbaijan
State Oil Fund of the Republic of Azerbaijan
Botswana
Pula Fund
Canada
Alberta Heritage Savings Trust Fund
Chile
Economic and Social Stabilization Fund / Pension Reserve Fund
China
China Investment Corporation
Ireland
National Pensions Reserve Fund
Korea
Korea Investment Corporation
Kuwait
Kuwait Investment Authority
New Zealand
New Zealand Superannuation Fund
Norway
Government Pension Fund-Global
Qatar
Qatar Investment Authority
Russia
Reserve Fund
National Wealth Fund
Singapore
Temasek Holdings Pte. Ltd.
Government of Singapore Investment Corporation Pte. Ltd.
Timor Leste
Petroleum Fund of Timor-Leste
Trinidad and Tobago
Heritage and Stabilization Fund
The United Arab Emirates
Abu Dhabi Investment Authority
The United States
Alaska Permanent Fund
The Santiago Principles
The International Working Group of Sovereign Wealth Funds created a set of 24 best practices called the Generally Accepted Principles and Practices (GAPP) or the Santiago Principles:
- GAPP 1. Principle
The legal framework for the SWF should be sound and support its effective operation and the achievement of its stated objective(s).- GAPP 1.1 Subprinciple The legal framework for the SWF should ensure the legal soundness of the SWF and its transactions.
- GAPP 1.2 Subprinciple The key features of the SWF’s legal basis and structure, as well as the legal relationship between the SWF and the other state bodies, should be publicly disclosed.
- GAPP 2. Principle
The policy purpose of the SWF should be clearly defined and publicly disclosed. - GAPP 3. Principle
Where the SWF’s activities have significant direct domestic macroeconomic implications, those activities should be closely coordinated with the domestic fiscal and monetary authorities, so as to ensure consistency with the overall macroeconomic policies. - GAPP 4. Principle There should be clear and publicly disclosed policies, rules, procedures, or arrangements in relation to the SWF’s general approach to funding, withdrawal, and spending operations.
- GAPP 4.1 Subprinciple The source of SWF funding should be publicly disclosed.
- GAPP 4.2 Subprinciple The general approach to withdrawals from the SWF and spending on behalf of the government should be publicly disclosed.
- GAPP 5. Principle
The relevant statistical data pertaining to the SWF should be reported on a timely basis to the owner, or as otherwise required, for inclusion where appropriate in macroeconomic data sets. - GAPP 6. Principle
The governance framework for the SWF should be sound and establish a clear and effective division of roles and responsibilities in order to facilitate accountability and operational independence in the management of the SWF to pursue its objectives. - GAPP 7. Principle
The owner should set the objectives of the SWF, appoint the members of its governing body(ies) in accordance with clearly defined procedures, and exercise oversight over the SWF’s operations. - GAPP 8. Principle
The governing body(ies) should act in the best interests of the SWF, and have a clear mandate and adequate authority and competency to carry out its functions. - GAPP 9. Principle
The operational management of the SWF should implement the SWF’s strategies in an independent manner and in accordance with clearly defined responsibilities. - GAPP 10. Principle
The accountability framework for the SWF’s operations should be clearly defined in the relevant legislation, charter, other constitutive documents, or management agreement. - GAPP 11. Principle
An annual report and accompanying financial statements on the SWF’s operations and performance should be prepared in a timely fashion and in accordance with recognized international or national accounting standards in a consistent manner. - GAPP 12. Principle
The SWF’s operations and financial statements should be audited annually in accordance with recognized international or national auditing standards in a consistent manner. - GAPP 13. Principle
Professional and ethical standards should be clearly defined and made known to the members of the SWF’s governing body(ies), management, and staff. - GAPP 14. Principle
Dealing with third parties for the purpose of the SWF’s operational management should be based on economic and financial grounds, and follow clear rules and procedures. - GAPP 15. Principle
SWF operations and activities in host countries should be conducted in compliance with all applicable regulatory and disclosure requirements of the countries in which they operate. - GAPP 16. Principle
The governance framework and objectives, as well as the manner in which the SWF’s management is operationally independent from the owner, should be publicly disclosed. - GAPP 17. Principle
Relevant financial information regarding the SWF should be publicly disclosed to demonstrate its economic and financial orientation, so as to contribute to stability in international financial markets and enhance trust in recipient countries. - GAPP 18. Principle
The SWF’s investment policy should be clear and consistent with its defined objectives, risk tolerance, and investment strategy, as set by the owner or the governing body(ies), and be based on sound portfolio management principles.- GAPP 18.1 Subprinciple The investment policy should guide the SWF’s financial risk exposures and the possible use of leverage.
- GAPP 18.2 Subprinciple The investment policy should address the extent to which internal and/or external investment managers are used, the range of their activities and authority, and the process by which they are selected and their performance monitored.
- GAPP 18.3 Subprinciple A description of the investment policy of the SWF should be publicly disclosed.
- GAPP 19. Principle
The SWF’s investment decisions should aim to maximize risk-adjusted financial returns in a manner consistent with its investment policy, and based on economic and financial grounds.- GAPP 19.1 Subprinciple If investment decisions are subject to other than economic and financial considerations, these should be clearly set out in the investment policy and be publicly disclosed.
- GAPP 19.2 Subprinciple The management of an SWF’s assets should be consistent with what is generally accepted as sound asset management principles.
- GAPP 20. Principle
The SWF should not seek or take advantage of privileged information or inappropriate influence by the broader government in competing with private entities. - GAPP 21. Principle
SWFs view shareholder ownership rights as a fundamental element of their equity investments’ value. If an SWF chooses to exercise its ownership rights, it should do so in a manner that is consistent with its investment policy and protects the financial value of its investments. The SWF should publicly disclose its general approach to voting securities of listed entities, including the key factors guiding its exercise of ownership rights. - GAPP 22. Principle
The SWF should have a framework that identifies, assesses, and manages the risks of its operations.- GAPP 22.1 Subprinciple The risk management framework should include reliable information and timely reporting systems, which should enable the adequate monitoring and management of relevant risks within acceptable parameters and levels, control and incentive mechanisms, codes of conduct, business continuity planning, and an independent audit function.
- GAPP 22.2 Subprinciple The general approach to the SWF’s risk management framework should be publicly disclosed.
- GAPP 23. Principle
The assets and investment performance (absolute and relative to benchmarks, if any) of the SWF should be measured and reported to the owner according to clearly defined principles or standards. - GAPP 24. Principle
A process of regular review of the implementation of the GAPP should be engaged in by or on behalf of the SWF.
There is also a Full Report on the Santiago Principles (.pdf).