Skip to content

Compliance Building

Doug Cornelius on compliance for private equity real estate

Menu
  • Home
  • About
    • About
    • About Doug
    • About This Website
    • Why I Blog
    • Speaking Engagements
    • Contact
    • Publications
  • Archives
    • Topic Archive
    • Book Reviews
    • Most Popular
  • Subscribe
  • Disclaimers
    • Disclaimers
    • Policies and Procedures
    • Use of Site Content
    • Comments
    • FTC Disclosure
Menu

Is Failure to Disclose Misappropriation Committing Securities Fraud?

Posted on September 3, 2026September 2, 2026 by Doug Cornelius
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The charges against Mark D. Hanf and Hoai-Nam Chu Phan at the California-based Pacific Private Money Group LLC looked liked a fairly regular investment scheme gone bad, turned into a Ponzi-scheme. They raised capital with the intent of making real estate loans.

They got hit by the rise in interest rates in 2022 and became unprofitable. Rather than settle up with investor, they took the Ponzi approach and funded investor distributions with new capital raises. Classic fall from grace. They could never catch up and eventually declared bankruptcy. Maybe that’s being too favorable to them. It looks like they may have also siphoned off money for personal use according to the SEC complaint.

It all looked like a fairly ordinary failed investment scheme until I got halfway through the SEC complaint.

Maybe I’m reading this wrong:

“46. Hanf’s failures to disclose his intention to misappropriate investment funds and his past practice of doing so were material to a reasonable investor as well as the actual defrauded investors of the Pacific Fund and the Freedom Fund. It would have been important for investors to know that Hanf had a practice of misappropriating money invested in the Pacific Fund and/or the Freedom Fund for his personal benefit—including to buy and maintain properties and to pay various other personal expenses—rather than using investor money solely for the funds’ purported real estate-backed loan businesses.”

Is the SEC really saying that they should have disclosed the they were going to misappropriate funds as part of the offering? Would a disclosure have made the whole thing not an actionable fraud?

That seems like a crazy claim to have been put in the complaint.

Sources:

  • Founder And CEO Of Bay Area Real Estate Investment Fund Charged In Multi-Year Fraud Scheme
  • SEC Charges San Francisco Bay Area Private Fund Executives with Multimillion Dollar Ponzi-Like Scheme
  • SEC Complaint
  • Executives of failed Marin lender charged with money laundering in alleged $103 million fraud scheme by Laura Waxman
  • Embattled firm Pacific Private Money files for bankruptcy as investigations continue

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search for Stuff

Recent Stories

  • No Insider Trading Too Small
  • Cancel-Rebill and Screw Your Clients
  • New Risk Alert on Investment Adviser Annual Compliance Reviews
  • When Compliance Says “Do It”, But the Firm Doesn’t
  • Extending Compliance Dates for Form PF
  • The Massive Scope of Digital Asset Investment Scams
  • SEC Proposes Rescission of Political Contribution Rule for Investment Advisers
  • Is Failure to Disclose Misappropriation Committing Securities Fraud?
  • SEC Sweep of Fake Form ADV Filers
  • New Custody Rule Is On Its Way

Fight Cancer

Please support my Pan-Mass Challenge
Make a donation to fight cancer. donate.pmc.org/DC0176
pan-mass challenge badge

I am a lawyer, but I am not your lawyer. Since I’m a lawyer, this website may be considered attorney advertising under the ethical rules of certain jurisdictions. Please read my disclaimers page before taking any action. And then, don't take any action based on what I wrote.

Creative Commons logo with the text 'Some Rights Reserved' and three symbols representing attribution, non-commercial use, and share alike.

Compliance Building - by Doug Cornelius is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.

© 2026 Compliance Building | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme