Skip to content

Compliance Building

Doug Cornelius on compliance for private equity real estate

Menu
  • Home
  • About
    • About
    • About Doug
    • About This Website
    • Why I Blog
    • Speaking Engagements
    • Contact
    • Publications
  • Archives
    • Topic Archive
    • Book Reviews
    • Most Popular
  • Subscribe
  • Disclaimers
    • Disclaimers
    • Policies and Procedures
    • Use of Site Content
    • Comments
    • FTC Disclosure
Menu
sec sign

The SEC 2026 Rulemaking Agenda

Posted on July 24, 2026July 23, 2026 by Doug Cornelius
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

On July 7, the SEC released its latest regulatory flexibility agenda. Browsing through the agenda, its a clear sign of de-regulation of financial services. Of the 38 items on the agenda, I highlight some that are most applicable to private funds.

Pay-to-Play Reform

The SES is considering “recommending that the Commission propose “amendments to rule 206(4)-5 under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, which prohibits investment adviser pay-to-play practices, to address identified compliance burdens.” Which compliance burdens are those? Low contribution thresholds? Steep penalties for inadvertent violation? Who is covered? Rescind it allow federal and state election laws to cover this.

Amendments to Investment Adviser Recordkeeping Rule

A project to propose amendments to Rule 204-2, the books and records rule, to address the “appropriate scope” and “identified compliance burdens related to electronic communications” and “to account for certain technological developments since the rule was adopted.” The book and records rule has been a mess for decades.

Enhancing Retail Exposure to Private Markets

A proposal to “better facilitate retail investor exposure to private markets through registered investment companies” and to allow “investment advisers to charge performance fees to an expanded set of clients.” This sounds like a reduction of the threshold for qualified client or a removal of the restriction. Not sure what the SEC is thinking about retail exposure to private markets through 40 Act funds.

My position with private market exposure is not an investors qualifications to discern good investments from bad. It’s an investor’s ability to withstand the illiquidity in private markets. Some public company may or may not be a good investment. But if you change your mind, you can be out of the position is seconds. There is little to no ability to exit from a private markets investment.

Updating the Exempt Offering Pathways

This seems to go hand in hand with the retail in private markets rule. Its looking to simplify pathways for raising capital and to amend the definition of accredited investors. As I said the risk with private placements is much more about liquidity than risk analysis.

Amendments to the Custody Rule

Pro-Crypto Chair Atkins is looking to make it easier for crypto to comply with the custody rule. Great. More ways for scammers to dump shitcoins on the public.

Sources:

  • Statement on the 2026 Regulatory Agenda from Chair Atkins
  • SEC Agency Rule List 2026


 I raise money for cancer research in his memory. I’m riding almost 300 miles during the first weekend of August in the Pan Mass Challenge.

If you enjoy reading Compliance Building, please donate a few dollars. 100% of your donation goes to cancer research.

Last weekend we had a training ride to visit Maggie, a vibrant 6-year old who is battle cancer. She is our new Pedal Partner.

pan mass challenge team kinetic karma

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search for Stuff

Recent Stories

  • The SEC 2026 Rulemaking Agenda
  • The Alignment Gap: Rethinking Costs in Private Equity Fund Formation
  • PERE 100 and SEC Registration
  • Neither Admit Nor Deny To Be No Longer
  • What Will Form PF Look Like Next Year?
  • Is It a Chipset or Is It a Security?
  • When the Lawyer Is Breaking Bad
  • Will Investors Have an Appetite for Semi-Annual Reporting?
  • Special Forces Trading on Insider Knowledge
  • Prediction Markets and Compliance Programs

Fight Cancer

Please support my Pan-Mass Challenge
Make a donation to fight cancer. donate.pmc.org/DC0176
pan-mass challenge badge

I am a lawyer, but I am not your lawyer. Since I’m a lawyer, this website may be considered attorney advertising under the ethical rules of certain jurisdictions. Please read my disclaimers page before taking any action. And then, don't take any action based on what I wrote.

Creative Commons logo with the text 'Some Rights Reserved' and three symbols representing attribution, non-commercial use, and share alike.

Compliance Building - by Doug Cornelius is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.