Skip to content

Compliance Building

Doug Cornelius on compliance for private equity real estate

Menu
  • Home
  • About
    • About
    • About Doug
    • About This Website
    • Why I Blog
    • Speaking Engagements
    • Contact
    • Publications
  • Archives
    • Topic Archive
    • Book Reviews
    • Most Popular
  • Subscribe
  • Disclaimers
    • Disclaimers
    • Policies and Procedures
    • Use of Site Content
    • Comments
    • FTC Disclosure
Menu

Things not to put in Advisory Contracts – Hedges

Posted on January 28, 2026January 27, 2026 by Doug Cornelius
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The Securities and Exchange Commission labels language purporting to limit an adviser’s liability in an advisory agreement as a “hedge clause.” In 2019, the SEC published the Commission Interpretation Regarding Standard of Conduct for Investment Advisers summarizing its position on an advisor’s fiduciary obligations. That statement stated:

“there are few (if any) circumstances in which a hedge clause in an agreement with a retail client would be consistent with [] antifraud provisions, where the hedge clause purports to relieve the adviser from liability for conduct as to which the client has a non-waivable cause of action against the adviser provided by state or federal law. Such a hedge clause generally is likely to mislead those retail clients into not exercising their legal rights, in violation of the antifraud provisions, even where the agreement otherwise specifies that the client may continue to retain its non-waivable rights. (footnote 11)”

During an exam, the SEC found these provisions in an advisor’s agreements with retail clients, which the SEC characterized as hedge clauses:

R. Limited Liability: [Respondents] shall not be liable to Client, its agents or representatives thereof, for any act, omission, or determination made in connection with this Agreement except for its willful misconduct or gross negligence. . .”
T. Liability [Respondents] shall not be subject to liability for any act or omission in the course of, or connected with, its performance of this Agreement, except in the case of willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence on the part of [Respondents], or the reckless disregard by the [Respondents] of its obligations and duties under this Agreement, but nothing herein shall in any way constitute a waiver or limitation of any rights which Client may have under any federal or state securities law or the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), if applicable…
Schedule A, T. Indemnification: Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement, Client shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless [Respondents]… against any and all losses, claims, damages, liabilities, actions, costs or expenses to which such indemnified party may become subject to the extent such losses, claims, damages, liabilities, actions, costs or expenses arise out of or are based upon . . . (b) any violation of federal or state securities, trust or insurance laws by [Respondents], its officers, its agents, or its employees arising out of the purchase, sale, offer to purchase or offer to sell any security; (c) any breach, default or violation of, under or with respect to any of [Respondents’] duties, obligations, representations, warranties or covenants contained in this Agreement; or (d) any negligence, gross negligence, recklessness or willful or intentional misconduct of, or violation of any law by [Respondents] or any FamilyWealth employee or agent.

The SEC concluded:

“The language, when read in its entirety, is inconsistent with an adviser’s fiduciary duty because it may mislead Respondents’ retail clients into not exercising their nonwaivable legal rights. Accordingly, the Respondents’ use of these hedge clauses violated Section 206(2) of the Advisers Act.”

Sources:

  • In the Matter of FamilyWealth Advisers, LLC and FamilyWealth Asset Management, LLC January 20, 2026
  • Commission Interpretation Regarding Standard of Conduct for Investment Advisers, IA Rel. No. 5248

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search for Stuff

Recent Stories

  • California’s Fair Investment Practices by Venture Capital Companies
  • Compliance Bricks and Mortar for January 30
  • Interpreter Insider Trading
  • Things not to put in Advisory Contracts – Hedges
  • Weekend Reading: Bad Company
  • Things to Not Put in an Advisory Agreement – Assignment Rights
  • Congressional Stock Trading and Private Insider Trading
  • Model Fees Versus Actual Fees in Marketing
  • Compliance Bricks and Mortar for January 16
  • Staff Report on Capital-Raising Dynamics

Fight Cancer

Please support my Pan-Mass Challenge
Make a donation to fight cancer. donate.pmc.org/DC0176
pan-mass challenge badge

I am a lawyer, but I am not your lawyer. Since I’m a lawyer, this website may be considered attorney advertising under the ethical rules of certain jurisdictions. Please read my disclaimers page before taking any action. And then, don't take any action based on what I wrote.

Creative Commons logo with the text 'Some Rights Reserved' and three symbols representing attribution, non-commercial use, and share alike.

Compliance Building - by Doug Cornelius is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.