Skip to content

Compliance Building

Doug Cornelius on compliance for private equity real estate

Menu
  • Home
  • About
    • About
    • About Doug
    • About This Website
    • Why I Blog
    • Speaking Engagements
    • Contact
    • Publications
  • Archives
    • Topic Archive
    • Book Reviews
    • Most Popular
  • Subscribe
  • Disclaimers
    • Disclaimers
    • Policies and Procedures
    • Use of Site Content
    • Comments
    • FTC Disclosure
Menu
brick wall

Compliance Bricks and Mortar for January 9

Posted on January 9, 2026January 7, 2026 by Doug Cornelius
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Here are some compliance related stories that recently caught my attention.


Office of Investor Advocate Report Addresses Ownership of Private Market Securities

by Meredith Ervine in TheCorporateCounsel.Net

In mid-December, the SEC’s Office of the Investor Advocate delivered its Report on Activities for the Fiscal Year 2025 to Congress. As highlighted in the announcement, the report provides an update on the office’s investor research activities, discusses the office’s engagements with investors, and describes its ongoing advocacy efforts. 


Six Compliance Events to Watch in 2026

by Matt Kelly in Radical Compliance

Control of Congress

…. Second, if Democrats do take control of Congress, that will have huge implications for corporate regulation in 2027 and beyond. For example, we might see Democrats freeze budget allocations until Trump starts putting Democratic appointees back on independent agencies; or we might see Trump ignore Democratically enacted laws, leaving you in regulatory compliance limbo. That uncertainty could linger until 2029 or beyond.


MSCI Backs Off on Crypto-Exclusion Plan But Signals Wider Review

by Isabelle Lee for Bloomberg

“Distinguishing between investment companies and other companies that hold non-operating assets, such as digital assets, as part of their core operations rather than for investment purposes requires further research and consultation with market participants,” the statement said. “For instance, assessing index eligibility across a range of these types of entities may require additional inclusion assessment criteria, such as financial-statement-based or other indicators.”


Why is Trump trying to control Greenland and Venezuela?

Anyone who has played Risk knows why.

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search for Stuff

Recent Stories

  • No Insider Trading Too Small
  • Cancel-Rebill and Screw Your Clients
  • New Risk Alert on Investment Adviser Annual Compliance Reviews
  • When Compliance Says “Do It”, But the Firm Doesn’t
  • Extending Compliance Dates for Form PF
  • The Massive Scope of Digital Asset Investment Scams
  • SEC Proposes Rescission of Political Contribution Rule for Investment Advisers
  • Is Failure to Disclose Misappropriation Committing Securities Fraud?
  • SEC Sweep of Fake Form ADV Filers
  • New Custody Rule Is On Its Way

Fight Cancer

Please support my Pan-Mass Challenge
Make a donation to fight cancer. donate.pmc.org/DC0176
pan-mass challenge badge

I am a lawyer, but I am not your lawyer. Since I’m a lawyer, this website may be considered attorney advertising under the ethical rules of certain jurisdictions. Please read my disclaimers page before taking any action. And then, don't take any action based on what I wrote.

Creative Commons logo with the text 'Some Rights Reserved' and three symbols representing attribution, non-commercial use, and share alike.

Compliance Building - by Doug Cornelius is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.

© 2026 Compliance Building | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme