Skip to content

Compliance Building

Doug Cornelius on compliance for private equity real estate

Menu
  • Home
  • About
    • About
    • About Doug
    • About This Website
    • Why I Blog
    • Speaking Engagements
    • Contact
    • Publications
  • Archives
    • Topic Archive
    • Book Reviews
    • Most Popular
  • Subscribe
  • Disclaimers
    • Disclaimers
    • Policies and Procedures
    • Use of Site Content
    • Comments
    • FTC Disclosure
Menu

Rising Backlash at the Killing of the Corporate Transparency Act

Posted on June 10, 2025June 13, 2025 by Doug Cornelius
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

At the end of March, FinCEN published an interim final rule that removes the beneficial ownership reporting requirements for U.S. companies and limits it to only those entities that are formed under the law of a foreign country and that have registered to do business in any U.S. State or Tribal jurisdiction. Comments are flowing in and they are not happy with the death of the Corporate Transparency Act.

Before its passage, the CTA garnered support from dozens of law enforcement and other stakeholders, including 42 state Attorneys General, the Fraternal Order of Police, and the National District Attorneys Association. 

Two of the principals architects of the passage of the CTA submitted a damning condemnation of the interim final rule. Senators Whitehouse (D-RI) and Grassley (R-IA) submitted a comment to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent raising concerns and expressing disagreement with the interim final rule.

“The Treasury Department’s decision to categorically exempt all U.S. persons and domestic entities from the CTA’s beneficial ownership information reporting requirements is inconsistent with the text and original policy goals of the CTA. We encourage you to rescind this interim final rule and fully implement the CTA so that law enforcement and national security agencies around the country have access to information necessary to prevent human trafficking, terrorist financing, border smuggling, drug distribution, sanctions evasion, and many other categories of criminal activity.”

Senators Whitehouse and Grassley were the original sponsors of the TITLE Act which was the precursor to the Corporate Transparency Act.

When I saw the interim final rule I questioned whether it would stand up to judicial scrutiny since it seems to ignore the text of the statute. If this rule stays in place it looks like there are groups that are willing to challenge it. I think the CTA is not quite dead yet.

Sources:

  • Comments on Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Requirement Revision and Deadline Extension
  • Comment Letter from Senators Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) and Chuck Grassley (R-IA)
  • Experts Warn US Treasury Rule Will Aid Criminal Shell Firms by Zdravko Ljubas
  • Backlash Mounts as Treasury Issues Interim Final Rule Gutting Corporate Transparency Act

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

2 thoughts on “Rising Backlash at the Killing of the Corporate Transparency Act”

  1. Gus says:
    June 30, 2025 at 9:03 am

    Doug, do you think the groups that want to preserve the CTA have standing to sue?

    Reply
    1. Doug Cornelius says:
      July 15, 2025 at 2:58 pm

      Gus – I suspect standing will be an issue in the fight to get the CTA back online. They will need to find the right plaintiff to file the case once the interim final is switched to just final. Who is an aggrieved party? Banks? Any financial institution expecting to get access to the BOI database to help with AML?

      Reply

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search for Stuff

Recent Stories

  • Compliance Bricks and Mortar for January 16
  • Staff Report on Capital-Raising Dynamics
  • Compliance Bricks and Mortar for January 9
  • “Small”: I Don’t Think You Know What That Means
  • CFTC is Saying Goodbye to Private Funds
  • New York’s LLC Transparency Act Will Remain Limited
  • SEC and CFTC With Only Republicans
  • Compliance Books from 2025
  • Happy New Year
  • The One That Can Drive You and Give You Investment Advice

Fight Cancer

Please support my Pan-Mass Challenge
Make a donation to fight cancer. donate.pmc.org/DC0176
pan-mass challenge badge

I am a lawyer, but I am not your lawyer. Since I’m a lawyer, this website may be considered attorney advertising under the ethical rules of certain jurisdictions. Please read my disclaimers page before taking any action. And then, don't take any action based on what I wrote.

Creative Commons logo with the text 'Some Rights Reserved' and three symbols representing attribution, non-commercial use, and share alike.

Compliance Building - by Doug Cornelius is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.