Skip to content

Compliance Building

Doug Cornelius on compliance for private equity real estate

Menu
  • Home
  • About
    • About
    • About Doug
    • About This Website
    • Why I Blog
    • Speaking Engagements
    • Contact
    • Publications
  • Archives
    • Topic Archive
    • Book Reviews
    • Most Popular
  • Subscribe
  • Disclaimers
    • Disclaimers
    • Policies and Procedures
    • Use of Site Content
    • Comments
    • FTC Disclosure
Menu

The One Without an Anchor

Posted on May 29, 2025May 29, 2025 by Doug Cornelius
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

One legal question that has renewed interest over the past few years is “what is a security?” Crypto lovers will tell you that their stuff is not securities. It all goes back to the definition of “security” and the less conventional term within that definition of “investment contract.” The Howey test focuses on that term within the definition.

The case against Anchor State Capital (formerly known as Anchor State Investments) and Anchor State Properties caught my attention as an alleged Ponzi scheme in Massachusetts. The promoter, Christopher Aubin is accused of taking investor money and not actually investing all of it. It seems like run of the mill fraud. Obviously, Mr. Aubin has not had an opportunity to defend himself against the accusations.

Was he selling securities? The SEC complaint states that the investments involved slightly different forms called “Investment Contracts,” “Partner Contracts,” or “Real Estate Partner Contracts.” I’m going to guess that at least one of those forms is going to be considered a security.

Sources:

  • SEC Charges Massachusetts Resident and his Companies with Stealing Investors’ Money
  • SEC Complaint against Christopher Aubin; Anchor State Capital LLC, f/k/a Anchor State Investments LLC; Anchor State Properties LLC
  • Feds accuse man in alleged investment scheme to pay for luxury lifestyle
  • 7 Investigates: ‘That was everything I had’- Investors left empty handed after alleged fraud scheme
  • RI Marine Accused of Running Ponzi Scheme Has Created Two New Companies

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search for Stuff

Recent Stories

  • Neither Admit Nor Deny To Be No Longer
  • What Will Form PF Look Like Next Year?
  • Is It a Chipset or Is It a Security?
  • When the Lawyer Is Breaking Bad
  • Will Investors Have an Appetite for Semi-Annual Reporting?
  • Special Forces Trading on Insider Knowledge
  • Prediction Markets and Compliance Programs
  • The One with the Line That Goes Straight Up and Right
  • The One with the Crypto Paying for a Mega-Shilling Package
  • The Performance of the SEC in 2025

Fight Cancer

Please support my Pan-Mass Challenge
Make a donation to fight cancer. donate.pmc.org/DC0176
pan-mass challenge badge

I am a lawyer, but I am not your lawyer. Since I’m a lawyer, this website may be considered attorney advertising under the ethical rules of certain jurisdictions. Please read my disclaimers page before taking any action. And then, don't take any action based on what I wrote.

Creative Commons logo with the text 'Some Rights Reserved' and three symbols representing attribution, non-commercial use, and share alike.

Compliance Building - by Doug Cornelius is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.