Skip to content

Compliance Building

Doug Cornelius on compliance for private equity real estate

Menu
  • Home
  • About
    • About
    • About Doug
    • About This Website
    • Why I Blog
    • Speaking Engagements
    • Contact
    • Publications
  • Archives
    • Topic Archive
    • Book Reviews
    • Most Popular
  • Subscribe
  • Disclaimers
    • Disclaimers
    • Policies and Procedures
    • Use of Site Content
    • Comments
    • FTC Disclosure
Menu

Saying You Have Good AML, When You Have Bad AML

Posted on January 31, 2025January 30, 2025 by Doug Cornelius
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

This year is Anti-Money Laundering year for registered investment advisers. FinCEN promulgated the Investment Adviser Rule. With the Bank Secrecy Act now applicable to registered investment advisers, with a compliance deadline for January 1, 2026, fund managers and advisers will need to update their anti-money laundering policies and procedures to deal with the new regulatory requirement.

Of course, most advisers are already have some sort of anti-money laundering procedures in place. Some even say so in their in their marketing materials.

Of course, the classic compliance rule for investment advisers is: “Do What You Say You do.”

Navy Capital Green Management represented in offering and other documents provided to prospective and existing investors in pooled investment vehicles that Navy Capital conducted specific AML due diligence on prospective investors and ongoing AML due diligence monitoring on existing investors. It also represented that it was voluntarily complying with AML due diligence laws that did not apply to investment advisers.

But, Navy Capital’s actual AML due diligence practices were materially inconsistent with its representations to investors in the pooled investment vehicles it managed, so the SEC charged Navy Capital with violation of Section 206(4) of the Advisers Act and Rule 206(4)-8.

Even worse, Navy Capital admitted a suspect person into one of its funds. Navy Capital did not conduct its stated pre-investment AML due diligence on the investor. Navy Capital did not even know the name of the investing entity until three days after the initial effective investment date. Navy Capital missed red flags in widely-circulated public reports of suspicions that the investor might have been connected to money laundering activities. That was what Navy Capital’s anti-money laundering policies and procedures were supposed to address.

Navy Capital accepted investments from other investors that disclosed on their subscription agreements they had zero assets. Hard to fund your commitment if you have no assets. Navy Capital should have obtained information about the source of the money funding the investment.

Sources:

  •  FinCEN Investment Adviser Rule
  • SEC Charges Advisory Firm Navy Capital With Misrepresenting Its Anti-Money Laundering Procedures to Investors
  • SEC Order

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search for Stuff

Recent Stories

  • California’s Fair Investment Practices by Venture Capital Companies
  • Compliance Bricks and Mortar for January 30
  • Interpreter Insider Trading
  • Things not to put in Advisory Contracts – Hedges
  • Weekend Reading: Bad Company
  • Things to Not Put in an Advisory Agreement – Assignment Rights
  • Congressional Stock Trading and Private Insider Trading
  • Model Fees Versus Actual Fees in Marketing
  • Compliance Bricks and Mortar for January 16
  • Staff Report on Capital-Raising Dynamics

Fight Cancer

Please support my Pan-Mass Challenge
Make a donation to fight cancer. donate.pmc.org/DC0176
pan-mass challenge badge

I am a lawyer, but I am not your lawyer. Since I’m a lawyer, this website may be considered attorney advertising under the ethical rules of certain jurisdictions. Please read my disclaimers page before taking any action. And then, don't take any action based on what I wrote.

Creative Commons logo with the text 'Some Rights Reserved' and three symbols representing attribution, non-commercial use, and share alike.

Compliance Building - by Doug Cornelius is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.