The new Marketing Rule for Registered Investment Advisers takes effect today. (Nov 4) Hopefully you’ve got your policies and procedures in place and operational, if the rule applies to you.
Many were hoping for some clarifications and updates. Only two questions were ever answered.
- An adviser may choose to comply with the amended marketing rule in its entirety any time starting on the effective date, May 4th, 2021. Until an adviser transitions to the amended marketing rule, the adviser would continue to comply with the previous advertising and cash solicitation rules and look to the staff’s positions under those rules. The staff believes an adviser may not cease complying with the previous advertising rule and instead comply with the amended marketing rule but still rely on the previous cash solicitation rule.
- The staff would not object if you are unable to calculate your one-, five-, and ten-year performance data in accordance with rule 206(4)-1(d)(2) immediately following a calendar year-end and you use performance information that is at least as current as the interim performance information in an advertisement until you can comply with the calendar year-end requirement.
There are several unanswered questions out there. I’ve seen two floating around with lots of discussion these last few weeks.
One is for private equity fund managers using extracted performance in a case study for a fund. I’ve seen conflicting advice from different consultants and law firms about whether you need to generate some kind of a net return for that single investment or whether you can use the net return for the fund.
The second is whether you need to update Form ADV Part 2 Question 14 regarding placement agents or solicitors right away to comply with the Marketing Rule. The SEC has said conflicting things about this update.
The Division of Examinations has already stated it will start a sweep exam on compliance with the Marketing Rule. (See the Risk Alert) Keep an eye on your phone Monday morning.
Sources:
