Skip to content

Compliance Building

Doug Cornelius on compliance for private equity real estate

Menu
  • Home
  • About
    • About
    • About Doug
    • About This Website
    • Why I Blog
    • Speaking Engagements
    • Contact
    • Publications
  • Archives
    • Topic Archive
    • Book Reviews
    • Most Popular
  • Subscribe
  • Disclaimers
    • Disclaimers
    • Policies and Procedures
    • Use of Site Content
    • Comments
    • FTC Disclosure
Menu

Can a Supercomputer Be a Security?

Posted on July 19, 2021March 25, 2024 by Doug Cornelius
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Accept at face value that Profit Connect is not a scam. That is a stretch given the purported high returns, coupled with a money back guarantee.

• 15% to 20% Fixed APR
• High-Net-Worth 30% APR
• APR is Locked-In
• 100% Money Back Guarantee

No such thing as high returns with no risk. Of course, if the returns are that good, why would the sponsor let you invest.

After going through the mumbo-jumbo on the website, I got to an interesting take on the investment structure.

“A Profit Connect Wealth Builder is not an Investment, it is a purchase of Supercomputer time (usage) and the use of an App that pays you money, for blockchain calculations delivered to a client. The blockchain client is found, managed and supported by Profit Connect. The Wealth Builder Depositor simply places a deposit for seat time and the App makes them money every month, giving you total peace of mind. All Wealth Builder APR percentages are Guaranteed and All Wealth Builders have a Lifetime Money Back Guarantee.”

They are making some claim that you are merely renting computer time. I make the logical leap that the firm is taking the position that you are not buying securities from Profit-Connect and the firm is not selling you securities. That could be true. Renting computer time to you run Bitcoin mining is probably not a security by itself.

The Securities and Exchange Commission doesn’t spend much time on this point in the complaint.

100. The investments were part of a common enterprise because both investors and Profit Connect were to make money through Profit Connect’s investments, because Profit Connect pooled all investor funds into one bank account (the Profit Connect Investor Account), and because Profit Connect used some of those funds to make payments to investors.

101. Profit Connect investors were passive investors with no involvement in Profit Connect’s investment activity.

102. Investors relied entirely on the efforts of Profit Connect, which claimed that investor money would be invested in sectors determined by Profit Connect’s proprietary “supercomputer.”

To me the Profit Connect supercomputer is like the Howey orange grove. Renting supercomputer time is analogous to renting an orange grove. But if you package that resource into someone else doing all the work with no input from you, it looks a more like a security. I can rent supercomputer time and mine bitcoins. I take the risk of valuation fluctuations, utility costs, and success rate. Profit Connect is purporting to do all that for me. I give them money, do no work, I’m not allowed to do any work, and they give me more money back. Yeah, that does sound like a security.

It seems unlikely that the Profit Connect supercomputer is a real thing. One of the firm’s principals had been previously convicted of securities fraud. The SEC alleges that the firm had no operating revenue. All of the money coming in came from “investors.” Most of the money was paid out to solicitors and to the sponsors for personal use.

Sources:

  • SEC Shuts Down Fraudulent Mother-Son Offering Involving Purported Supercomputer
  • SEC Complaint
  • What is a Security? Is Real Estate a Security?

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search for Stuff

Recent Stories

  • Compliance Bricks and Mortar for January 9
  • “Small”: I Don’t Think You Know What That Means
  • CFTC is Saying Goodbye to Private Funds
  • New York’s LLC Transparency Act Will Remain Limited
  • SEC and CFTC With Only Republicans
  • Compliance Books from 2025
  • Happy New Year
  • The One That Can Drive You and Give You Investment Advice
  • The One with the Foreclosure and OFAC Sanctions
  • Can Precious Gem Buying Being Securities Fraud?

Fight Cancer

Please support my Pan-Mass Challenge
Make a donation to fight cancer. donate.pmc.org/DC0176
pan-mass challenge badge

I am a lawyer, but I am not your lawyer. Since I’m a lawyer, this website may be considered attorney advertising under the ethical rules of certain jurisdictions. Please read my disclaimers page before taking any action. And then, don't take any action based on what I wrote.

Creative Commons logo with the text 'Some Rights Reserved' and three symbols representing attribution, non-commercial use, and share alike.

Compliance Building - by Doug Cornelius is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.