Skip to content

Compliance Building

Doug Cornelius on compliance for private equity real estate

Menu
  • Home
  • About
    • About
    • About Doug
    • About This Website
    • Why I Blog
    • Speaking Engagements
    • Contact
    • Publications
  • Archives
    • Topic Archive
    • Book Reviews
    • Most Popular
  • Subscribe
  • Disclaimers
    • Disclaimers
    • Policies and Procedures
    • Use of Site Content
    • Comments
    • FTC Disclosure
Menu

SPAC, SMACK, SHAQ?

Posted on April 13, 2021April 13, 2021 by Doug Cornelius
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

SPACs are the current tulips of the markets. Everyone wants a piece of one. Celebrities are joining the rush. As noted in the title, Shaq has one. Actually Shaq is on his second SPAC.

Almost 250 SPAC IPOs were completed in 2020, raising total gross proceeds of approximately $75 billion That was about half of the number of IPOs and half of the capital raised in IPOs.

There are lots or reasons for companies to become liquid and raise capital through a SPAC. There is certainty in pricing. Private company founders and their backers don’t have to spend months worried about how much capital will be raised in an IPO. They negotiate the capital raise with the SPAC executives.

The downside is that the private company may not have been through the compliance wringer to make sure it’s ready for the rigors of being a public company.

The SEC is catching up and has released a series of statements and policy notices about SPACs. The Division of Corporate Finance pointed out that these newly crafted public companies have to focus on their books and records and their financial controls. The public SPACs have to meet these standards. But since they are just sitting on a pile of cash, their controls can be very simple. It’s really the controls of the acquired company that will be in operation.

A public statement by the SEC’s Chief Accountant also pointed to the financial controls, governance, and audit controls that creates faith in the public markets.

One item that the SEC has started to focus on is the treatment of the warrants involved in the SPAC combination. The reason that sponsors are jumping on the SPAC bandwagon is the promote granted to the SPAC organizers in the form of warrants.

The Securities and Exchange Commission last week began privately telling accountants that warrants, which are issued to early investors in the deals, might not be considered equity instruments, according to people familiar with the matter.

It’s the special sauce that has helped lubricate the SPAC engine. It’s not a bubble in valuation. It’s a bubble in method.

Sources:

  • Corp Fin’s “SPAC” Statement: All That Glitters Is Not Gold
  • Financial Reporting and Auditing Considerations of Companies Merging with SPACs
  • Staff Statement on Select Issues Pertaining to Special Purpose Acquisition Companies
  • SPACs Draw Internal Control, Governance Concerns
  • Shaq SPAC 2.0 Coming With 3 Former Disney Executives: What Investors Should Know
  • SPAC Boom Faces Latest Threat From SEC in Accounting Discussions

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search for Stuff

Recent Stories

  • Model Fees Versus Actual Fees in Marketing
  • Compliance Bricks and Mortar for January 16
  • Staff Report on Capital-Raising Dynamics
  • Compliance Bricks and Mortar for January 9
  • “Small”: I Don’t Think You Know What That Means
  • CFTC is Saying Goodbye to Private Funds
  • New York’s LLC Transparency Act Will Remain Limited
  • SEC and CFTC With Only Republicans
  • Compliance Books from 2025
  • Happy New Year

Fight Cancer

Please support my Pan-Mass Challenge
Make a donation to fight cancer. donate.pmc.org/DC0176
pan-mass challenge badge

I am a lawyer, but I am not your lawyer. Since I’m a lawyer, this website may be considered attorney advertising under the ethical rules of certain jurisdictions. Please read my disclaimers page before taking any action. And then, don't take any action based on what I wrote.

Creative Commons logo with the text 'Some Rights Reserved' and three symbols representing attribution, non-commercial use, and share alike.

Compliance Building - by Doug Cornelius is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.