Skip to content

Compliance Building

Doug Cornelius on compliance for private equity real estate

Menu
  • Home
  • About
    • About
    • About Doug
    • About This Website
    • Why I Blog
    • Speaking Engagements
    • Contact
    • Publications
  • Archives
    • Topic Archive
    • Book Reviews
    • Most Popular
  • Subscribe
  • Disclaimers
    • Disclaimers
    • Policies and Procedures
    • Use of Site Content
    • Comments
    • FTC Disclosure
Menu

Pre-existing, Substantive Relationships and General Solicitation

Posted on April 3, 2019April 3, 2019 by Doug Cornelius
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

As cryptocurrency issuance declines, the Securities and Exchange Commission is continuing to clean out the fraud, mis-steps, and foolishness of coin promoters. These actions have carried over to the services and investment managers involved in coin offerings.

Usman Majeed wanted to make his money by running a fund that invests in cryptocurrency. He ran into the same mistakes and ignorance of the securities laws that coin promoters stumble over. His platform was Mutual Coin Fund, with an approach that is “purely quantitative and involves algorithmic trading with intense backtesting…” and develops “new trading strategies involving artificial intelligence and machine learning through neural networks.”

That sounds like a lot of the same gobbley-gook for a crypto-fund offering that you hear for a coin offering.

That aside, he still managed to raise over $500,000 from investors from August 2017 to May 2018. Then managed to lose 62% of it by March 2019.

From the SEC order, it sounds like enforcement decided to focus on the marketing failure. Mr. Majeed and the fund didn’t have a pre-existing, substantive relationship with the investors. The fund engaged in general solicitation through its website and media interviews.

The fund could have engaged in general solicitation if it checked the 506(c) box on its Form D. But it checked the 506(b) box.

Of course, with 506(c) the fund would have needed to take reasonable steps to confirm that investors were accredited investors. But at least one investor was not accredited according to the SEC order.

Sources:

  • SEC Order against Mutual Coin Fund and Usman Majeed
  • Fund Sponsor Violated Private Offering Rules
  • Mutual Coin Fund Form D Filing
  • ICO promoters more careful but still using SEC back door to raise funds by Francine McKenna and Katie Marriner
  • ATB Coin is a ‘security’ under Howey test by Amy Leisinger, J.D.

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search for Stuff

Recent Stories

  • Model Fees Versus Actual Fees in Marketing
  • Compliance Bricks and Mortar for January 16
  • Staff Report on Capital-Raising Dynamics
  • Compliance Bricks and Mortar for January 9
  • “Small”: I Don’t Think You Know What That Means
  • CFTC is Saying Goodbye to Private Funds
  • New York’s LLC Transparency Act Will Remain Limited
  • SEC and CFTC With Only Republicans
  • Compliance Books from 2025
  • Happy New Year

Fight Cancer

Please support my Pan-Mass Challenge
Make a donation to fight cancer. donate.pmc.org/DC0176
pan-mass challenge badge

I am a lawyer, but I am not your lawyer. Since I’m a lawyer, this website may be considered attorney advertising under the ethical rules of certain jurisdictions. Please read my disclaimers page before taking any action. And then, don't take any action based on what I wrote.

Creative Commons logo with the text 'Some Rights Reserved' and three symbols representing attribution, non-commercial use, and share alike.

Compliance Building - by Doug Cornelius is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.