Skip to content

Compliance Building

Doug Cornelius on compliance for private equity real estate

Menu
  • Home
  • About
    • About
    • About Doug
    • About This Website
    • Why I Blog
    • Speaking Engagements
    • Contact
    • Publications
  • Archives
    • Topic Archive
    • Book Reviews
    • Most Popular
  • Subscribe
  • Disclaimers
    • Disclaimers
    • Policies and Procedures
    • Use of Site Content
    • Comments
    • FTC Disclosure
Menu

If Your Clients Are Going to Lose Money Anyway, Why Not Just Steal It?

Posted on October 3, 2018 by Doug Cornelius
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Say you run a trading platform and lots of your traders lose money. Why not just take their money for yourself instead of them losing it to the market?

For one, that’s stealing.

But apparently that didn’t stop Jeffrey Goldman, Naris Chamroonrat, Christopher Eikenberry, Ran Armon, Adam Plummer, and Yaniv Avnon from doing just that.  They set up Nonko Trading as a purported offshore proprietary trading firm. It was organized to cater to U.S.-based day-traders, but evading the U.S. Broker-Dealer registration and regulatory requirements.

The Nonko group interviewed traders first. They targeted traders that appeared inexperienced or unsophisticated. Instead of providing these traders with access to a live securities trading platform, the Nonko team provided them with training accounts that merely trading.  When these traders sent funds to Nonko to place securities trade orders, the orders were never actually sent to the markets. Instead, the Nonko team simply pocketed the traders’ money.

Their theory is that the traders won’t notice that you stole their money if they were going to lose it anyway. If you’ve see The Producers you know how this works. Your targets won’t know you’ve stolen you money if the targets thought they lost it.

If a trader stated to make money, they moved that trader from the simulation on the TRZ platform to the live NTRD version of the platform.

The Nonko crew apparently left a trail of messages pointing out their misdeeds”

the current frame work [sic] now with TRZ is that we interview the
traders first and make sure they are complete newbs before putting
them on TRZ, while at the same time, we have a close watch to see
which account is starting to make money, at any point in time they
start to show signs of profitablity [sic] we quickly switch them
over to a NTRD account (live)
with this new platform, we will use the same process but as we
expect to have smaller deposits and more new accounts, we will
have to figuire [sic] a more stricter way to flag “game” accounts,
we havent [sic] gotten that far yet

The Nonko Group lured day traders by offering high margin limits (20:1) and small commissions. They also put together written TRZ Guidelines on which traders should be selected for the fraudulent TRZ platform.

During the initial phases of the training accounts scheme, Goldman commented to Chamroonrat on Skype: “trz group down 3k…every trader down. How come part of me feels good and part of me feels bad?!?!??”

You feel bad, because you’re stealing their money.

In The Producers, the scheme goes awry when the production makes money. For Nanko, it went wrong when a newbie trader on the TRZ version called the underlying provider for technical help. The help desk was confused that the trader thought his simulation was real. Once the provider saw the problem it emailed all of the TRZ traders telling them it was just a simulation.

Sources:

  • SEC Charges Two Men With Fraud in Fake Trading Accounts Scheme
  • SEC Complaint
  • SEC Names Additional Defendants in the Nonko Trading Fraud Case

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search for Stuff

Recent Stories

  • The SEC 2026 Rulemaking Agenda
  • The Alignment Gap: Rethinking Costs in Private Equity Fund Formation
  • PERE 100 and SEC Registration
  • Neither Admit Nor Deny To Be No Longer
  • What Will Form PF Look Like Next Year?
  • Is It a Chipset or Is It a Security?
  • When the Lawyer Is Breaking Bad
  • Will Investors Have an Appetite for Semi-Annual Reporting?
  • Special Forces Trading on Insider Knowledge
  • Prediction Markets and Compliance Programs

Fight Cancer

Please support my Pan-Mass Challenge
Make a donation to fight cancer. donate.pmc.org/DC0176
pan-mass challenge badge

I am a lawyer, but I am not your lawyer. Since I’m a lawyer, this website may be considered attorney advertising under the ethical rules of certain jurisdictions. Please read my disclaimers page before taking any action. And then, don't take any action based on what I wrote.

Creative Commons logo with the text 'Some Rights Reserved' and three symbols representing attribution, non-commercial use, and share alike.

Compliance Building - by Doug Cornelius is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.