Skip to content

Compliance Building

Doug Cornelius on compliance for private equity real estate

Menu
  • Home
  • About
    • About
    • About Doug
    • About This Website
    • Why I Blog
    • Speaking Engagements
    • Contact
    • Publications
  • Archives
    • Topic Archive
    • Book Reviews
    • Most Popular
  • Subscribe
  • Disclaimers
    • Disclaimers
    • Policies and Procedures
    • Use of Site Content
    • Comments
    • FTC Disclosure
Menu

Changes to the SEC’s Whistleblower Program

Posted on July 2, 2018 by Doug Cornelius
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Seven years ago the Securities and Exchange Commission opened its Office of the Whistleblower under the authorization of the Dodd-Frank Act. Since then the SEC has received over 22,000 whistleblower tips, obtained over $1.4 billion in financial remedies related to those tips, and ordered over $266 million in whistleblower awards to 55 individuals. Now, the SEC wants to tweak the program and offered up a series of regulatory revisions.

More Settlements Would Eligible

The first change is to expand the scope of actions that are subject to whistleblower awards. The current SEC whistleblower rules do not address whether the SEC can pay an award when the information that leads to a Deferred Prosecution Agreement or Non-Prosecution Agreement entered into by DOJ or a state attorney general in a criminal proceeding. The SEC is also looking for the discretion to award whistleblower claims based on public information using independent evaluation and analysis.

More for Smaller Settlements

The second change is to push for a higher award in smaller cases. According to the SEC, 60% of the whistleblower awards have been less than $2 million. The SEC is trying to set a $2 million floor, subject to the Section 922 cap of 30% of the award. The purpose of the change is to reward meritorious whistleblowers and incentivize future whistleblowers who might otherwise be concerned about the low dollar amount of a potential award.

Less for Bigger Settlements

The third change is related to the remaining 40% of funds paid out in claims. That 40% represents just three awards. For big cases, the SEC wants to be able to cap the award at $30 million, subject to the Section 922 floor of 10% of the award.

Digital Realty Fix

In the Digital Realty case decided by the Supreme Court earlier this year, the Court held that the whistleblower provisions of the Exchange Act require a person to report a possible securities law violation to the SEC in order to qualify for protection against employment retaliation.  For purposes of retaliation protection, an individual would be required to report information about possible securities laws violations to the Commission “in writing”.

Others

Besides these four big changes, there are several other smaller changes to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of the whistleblower program.

My Take

I think it’s great that the current SEC is willing re-evaluate its rules and fix them to make them work better. I bet most o fus could point to many parts of the SEC rules that need fixing. I hope they continue this process for other rules.

Sources:

  • SEC Proposes Whistleblower Rule Amendments
  • SEC proposes to limit whistleblower awards by Francine McKenna
  • Statement of Commissioner Piwowar at Open Meeting Regarding Amendments to the Commission’s Whistleblower Program Rule from Commissioner Michael S. Piwowar
  • Statement at Open Meeting on Amendments to the Commission’s Whistleblower Program Rule from Chairman Jay Clayton
  • Statement on Proposed Amendments to the Commission’s Whistleblower Program Rules by Commissioner Kara M. Stein
  • Statement on Proposed Rules Regarding SEC Whistleblower Program by  Commissioner Robert J. Jackson, Jr.
  • Statement at Open Meeting on Amendments to the Commission’s Whistleblower Program Rules by Commissioner Hester M. Peirce
  • Section 922 of Dodd-Frank: Whistleblower Protection
  • The Limit of Whistleblowers

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search for Stuff

Recent Stories

  • Model Fees Versus Actual Fees in Marketing
  • Compliance Bricks and Mortar for January 16
  • Staff Report on Capital-Raising Dynamics
  • Compliance Bricks and Mortar for January 9
  • “Small”: I Don’t Think You Know What That Means
  • CFTC is Saying Goodbye to Private Funds
  • New York’s LLC Transparency Act Will Remain Limited
  • SEC and CFTC With Only Republicans
  • Compliance Books from 2025
  • Happy New Year

Fight Cancer

Please support my Pan-Mass Challenge
Make a donation to fight cancer. donate.pmc.org/DC0176
pan-mass challenge badge

I am a lawyer, but I am not your lawyer. Since I’m a lawyer, this website may be considered attorney advertising under the ethical rules of certain jurisdictions. Please read my disclaimers page before taking any action. And then, don't take any action based on what I wrote.

Creative Commons logo with the text 'Some Rights Reserved' and three symbols representing attribution, non-commercial use, and share alike.

Compliance Building - by Doug Cornelius is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.