Skip to content

Compliance Building

Doug Cornelius on compliance for private equity real estate

Menu
  • Home
  • About
    • About
    • About Doug
    • About This Website
    • Why I Blog
    • Speaking Engagements
    • Contact
    • Publications
  • Archives
    • Topic Archive
    • Book Reviews
    • Most Popular
  • Subscribe
  • Disclaimers
    • Disclaimers
    • Policies and Procedures
    • Use of Site Content
    • Comments
    • FTC Disclosure
Menu

International compliance for managers with a global presence in Europe – at the Private Fund Compliance Forum 2018

Posted on May 10, 2018May 9, 2018 by Doug Cornelius
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

GDPR is big boogeyman right now. The General Data Protection Regulation has a compliance deadline rapidly approaching in the EU. It protects the personal data of EU residents. It has extra-territorial implications. Firms need consent for use of the data or a specific business relationship. Data breach notifications have to be made within 72 hours. The terrifying aspect is the enormous fines that can be levied for violations. The deadline is May 25.

One tricky aspect under GDPR is website cookies and tracking data. And what do you do with business cards?

You need to keep logs of collected personal information and arrange for destruction upon request. GDPR has a broader definition of personal information than US laws which are generally limited to a name and account number.

GDPR and the new FinCEN anti-money laundering rules are coming online at the same time. leading firms to ask for new personal information, while also increasing the rules an penalties around have possession of that information.

MiFID II targets securities trading. The big change is having to pay for research costs, separate from paying for securities transactions. There are lots of reporting requirements. There is a requirement for recording phone calls. “Inducements” is one of the items to focus on, such as gifts and entertainment.

Anti-Money laundering rules are keyed around ownership of more than 25% of the fund.

The new Cayman AML law requires an AML officer and a Deputy AML officer. It also proscribes certain procedures.

(This session was subject to the Chatham House Rule so I have not identified the participants and have not attributed any of the statements to anyone.)

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search for Stuff

Recent Stories

  • No Insider Trading Too Small
  • Cancel-Rebill and Screw Your Clients
  • New Risk Alert on Investment Adviser Annual Compliance Reviews
  • When Compliance Says “Do It”, But the Firm Doesn’t
  • Extending Compliance Dates for Form PF
  • The Massive Scope of Digital Asset Investment Scams
  • SEC Proposes Rescission of Political Contribution Rule for Investment Advisers
  • Is Failure to Disclose Misappropriation Committing Securities Fraud?
  • SEC Sweep of Fake Form ADV Filers
  • New Custody Rule Is On Its Way

Fight Cancer

Please support my Pan-Mass Challenge
Make a donation to fight cancer. donate.pmc.org/DC0176
pan-mass challenge badge

I am a lawyer, but I am not your lawyer. Since I’m a lawyer, this website may be considered attorney advertising under the ethical rules of certain jurisdictions. Please read my disclaimers page before taking any action. And then, don't take any action based on what I wrote.

Creative Commons logo with the text 'Some Rights Reserved' and three symbols representing attribution, non-commercial use, and share alike.

Compliance Building - by Doug Cornelius is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.

© 2026 Compliance Building | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme