Skip to content

Compliance Building

Doug Cornelius on compliance for private equity real estate

Menu
  • Home
  • About
    • About
    • About Doug
    • About This Website
    • Why I Blog
    • Speaking Engagements
    • Contact
    • Publications
  • Archives
    • Topic Archive
    • Book Reviews
    • Most Popular
  • Subscribe
  • Disclaimers
    • Disclaimers
    • Policies and Procedures
    • Use of Site Content
    • Comments
    • FTC Disclosure
Menu

By No One’s Math Is 50 Percent a Vast Majority

Posted on October 2, 2017September 29, 2017 by Doug Cornelius
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

There is no place for hyperbole or fudging numbers in disclosure of investment returns. The Boston office of the Securities and Exchange Commission made that point with Aegerion Pharmaceuticals in its enforcement case.

According to the SEC complaint, Aegerion’s CEO said that the “vast majority of patients” who were given prescriptions for one of its drugs were taking the drug. However, the more accurate statement was that approximately 50% were taking it.

The problem was that in order to start the drug therapy, patients needed to maintain a low-fat diet and to seek regular liver monitoring. As for side effects, patients could experience nausea, vomiting, and stomach pain. Plus there was the enormous cost of the treatment: approximately $250,000 to $300,000 annually. Patients’ medical insurance may not agree to extend coverage.

Therefore, stock analysts covering the company were very focus on this conversion rate from prescription to treatment. On the first quarter 2013 earnings call, when asked about the conversion rate, Aegerion’s CEO said that the percentage of patients who did not convert: “[i]t’s a very small number. It’s not material.” On the second quarter 2013 earnings call, Aegerion’s CEO stated about the conversion rate: “We haven’t given that percent. It’s high. It’s very high.” He further asserted that the “vast majority of patients” who were given prescriptions actually followed through and began therapy.

I will be the first to admit that those are fuzzy statements. But I agree that saying “very high” or “vast majority” is far more than 50%. According to the SEC complaint, analysts plugged 85% or 90% into their financial analysis of the company.

Things began to fall part on the fourth quarter 2013 earnings call when Aegerion admitted that more patients were reluctant to start taking the treatment than previously anticipated. It was not until the third quarter 2014 earnings call that Aegerion was more exact and more accurate when it disclosed that the conversion rate was in the “range of 50%-60%.” It should be no surprise that Aegerion’s stock price plummeted on the next trading day after that call. Clearly, analysts thought the “vast majority” was much higher than 50%-60%.

“By no one’s math is 50 percent a vast majority,” said Paul Levenson, Director of the SEC’s Boston Regional Office.  “When companies publicly discuss their financial data, they must be truthful.  Whether they supply hard numbers or give broader descriptions, they cannot mislead investors.”

The SEC’s actions is just part of Aegerion’s problems. It also is pleading guilty to criminal liability under HIPPA and civil liability for make false claims to a federal program. In a deferred prosecution agreement to resolve the HIPAA violations, Aegerion admitted that it obtained patients’ personally identifiable health information, without patient authorization, for commercial gain. Under the civil false claims settlement, Aegerion is paying a civil penalty for false claims submitted to government healthcare programs arising from its promotion of its therapy without a proper diagnosis.

Sources:

  • Pharmaceutical Company Paying Penalty for Misleading Investors About Sales Metric
  • SEC Complaint against Aegerion Pharmaceuticals
  • Algerion Plea Letter relating to its prescription drug, Juxtapid
  • Aegerion to Plead Guilty Pay $35 Million

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search for Stuff

Recent Stories

  • Compliance Bricks and Mortar for January 9
  • “Small”: I Don’t Think You Know What That Means
  • CFTC is Saying Goodbye to Private Funds
  • New York’s LLC Transparency Act Will Remain Limited
  • SEC and CFTC With Only Republicans
  • Compliance Books from 2025
  • Happy New Year
  • The One That Can Drive You and Give You Investment Advice
  • The One with the Foreclosure and OFAC Sanctions
  • Can Precious Gem Buying Being Securities Fraud?

Fight Cancer

Please support my Pan-Mass Challenge
Make a donation to fight cancer. donate.pmc.org/DC0176
pan-mass challenge badge

I am a lawyer, but I am not your lawyer. Since I’m a lawyer, this website may be considered attorney advertising under the ethical rules of certain jurisdictions. Please read my disclaimers page before taking any action. And then, don't take any action based on what I wrote.

Creative Commons logo with the text 'Some Rights Reserved' and three symbols representing attribution, non-commercial use, and share alike.

Compliance Building - by Doug Cornelius is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.