When a fraud is uncovered, the Securities and Exchange Commission not only wants to get the fraudsters, it also wants to get those who should have stopped the fraud: the gatekeepers. Recently, the SEC has brought charges against a fund administrator and fund auditors. The latest is a case against
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that a subsidiary of Oklahoma-based BOK Financial Corporation agreed to pay more than $1.6 million to settle charges that it concealed numerous problems and red flags from investors in municipal bond offerings to purchase and renovate senior living facilities. According to the SEC’s order, BOK Financial failed in its gatekeeper role as indenture trustee and dissemination agent for the bond offerings.
In a case brought last year, the SEC filed charges against Christopher F. Brogdon for dozens of municipal bond and private placement offerings in which investors supposedly earn interest from revenues generated by the nursing home, assisted living facility, or other retirement community project supported by their investment. But Brogdon secretly commingled investor funds instead of using the money to finance the project described to investors in the disclosure documents for each offering and diverted investor money to other business ventures and personal expenses.
According to the SEC’s order, BOK Financial, and a former senior vice president at the bank, Marrien Neilson, became aware of numerous red flags:
- Brogdon was withdrawing money from bond offering’s reserve funds and failing to replenish them.
- He had failed to file annual financial statements for the bond offerings.
- The nursing home facilities serving as collateral for one of the bond offerings had been closed for years.
But Neilson allegedly warned others that disclosing red flags could impair future business and fees from Brogdon, upset bondholders, and cause regulatory issues for bond underwriters. So Neilson and BOK Financial decided not to inform bondholders as required.
BOK Financial settled the charges. Neilson is challenging the charges, so we only have the SEC’s side of the story.
Neilson was the primary recipient of bonus compensation awarded on the basis of the fees paid to BOKF for the Brogdon Bond Offerings. She also received bonus compensation for other bond offerings that financed the sale of Brogdon-owned nursing homes and assisted living facilities to third parties. The SEC charged that she knew or recklessly disregarded that Brogdon was supposed to make disclosures to the bondholders about the red flags.
In the SEC Order, there are numerous emails showing Neilson in a poor light:
“In a March 1, 2010 email to one of Brogdon’s assistants regarding late debt service payments for an offering, Neilson states that the late payment put her “in an extremely awkward position” because “the Reserve Fund has previously been used and not replenished and I did not call a default.” In the same email, Neilson states that “[b]ondholders are going to want to know why we don’t used [sic] the Reserve Fund.” Neilson also states that “we need to disclose the other Reserve funds if they are not replenished,” asking Brogdon’s assistant “if you want a list of them and how much?”
I assume Brogdon was trying to keep his enterprise afloat and Neilson was helping him kick the can down the road. Perhaps a little more debt can buy a little more time to get cash flow positive. That didn’t happen and the debt facilities finally went into default and bankruptcy.
The gatekeeper should have stopped the fraud. Instead, it helped with a dozen more offerings expanding the scope of the fraud.
Sources:
- BOK Financial, Senior Executive Charged With Turning Blind Eye to Investment Scheme
- SEC order – BOKF
- SEC complaint – Neilson
- Atlanta Businessman Charged in Nursing Home Investment Scheme
- SEC Charges Fund Administrator as a Failed Gatekeeper
- Custody Failure Pinned On the Gatekeepers
- The SEC Goes After the Gatekeepers: Grant Thornton Edition
Château de Crécy-la-Chapelle: Gate by Baishiya 白石崖
CC BY SA
