Skip to content

Compliance Building

Doug Cornelius on compliance for private equity real estate

Menu
  • Home
  • About
    • About
    • About Doug
    • About This Website
    • Why I Blog
    • Speaking Engagements
    • Contact
    • Publications
  • Archives
    • Topic Archive
    • Book Reviews
    • Most Popular
  • Subscribe
  • Disclaimers
    • Disclaimers
    • Policies and Procedures
    • Use of Site Content
    • Comments
    • FTC Disclosure
Menu

Fraud, But Is It Securities Fraud?

Posted on June 6, 2016June 3, 2016 by Doug Cornelius
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Although the Securities and Exchange Commission gets blamed for not bringing enough fraud claims, it’s jurisdiction is limited to securities fraud. When I see a real estate case filed by the SEC I pay attention. The case against Richard W. Davis, Jr. brought the “What is a Security?” questions out.

mountains

The SEC alleges that Richard W. Davis Jr. breached his fiduciary duty and had conflicts of interest using investor money to enter into transactions with entities he beneficially owned or controlled.  The SEC further alleges that Davis made false or misleading statements to investors before and after they made their investments, failed to inform investors of their losses, commingled funds and took more management fees than was allowed.

Davis sold interests in two funds and he marketed them as investing in “hard assets” like real estate and mineral rights. I will assume those interests are securities. Mr. Davis would have needed to comply with the private placement requirements. According to the complaint, he did not do so.

The complaint labels the funds as “pooled investment vehicles” within the meaning of Rule 206(4)-8(b) of the Advisers Act, 17 C.F.R. § 275.206(4)- 8(b):

(b) Definition. For purposes of this section “pooled investment vehicle” means any investment company as defined in section 3(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-3(a)) or any company that would be an investment company under section 3(a) of that Act but for the exclusion provided from that definition by either section 3(c)(1) or section 3(c)(7) of that Act (15 U.S.C. 80a-3(c)(1) or (7))

To be an “investment company”, the pooled fund would need to invest in securities. A pooled fund that invests mostly and directly in real estate would fall outside the definition of an investment company.

The complaint is short on the details other than the bad acts alleged by the SEC. The issue is not contested since Mr. Davis agreed to settlement.

Sources:

  • Adviser Steered Investor Money to His Own Companies
  • SEC complaint
  • SEC charges Charlotte investment adviser with fraud
  • Secret Service investigating Charlotte investment adviser

Mountains National Bison Range Montana
By Jaix Chaix
CC BY SA

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search for Stuff

Recent Stories

  • No Insider Trading Too Small
  • Cancel-Rebill and Screw Your Clients
  • New Risk Alert on Investment Adviser Annual Compliance Reviews
  • When Compliance Says “Do It”, But the Firm Doesn’t
  • Extending Compliance Dates for Form PF
  • The Massive Scope of Digital Asset Investment Scams
  • SEC Proposes Rescission of Political Contribution Rule for Investment Advisers
  • Is Failure to Disclose Misappropriation Committing Securities Fraud?
  • SEC Sweep of Fake Form ADV Filers
  • New Custody Rule Is On Its Way

Fight Cancer

Please support my Pan-Mass Challenge
Make a donation to fight cancer. donate.pmc.org/DC0176
pan-mass challenge badge

I am a lawyer, but I am not your lawyer. Since I’m a lawyer, this website may be considered attorney advertising under the ethical rules of certain jurisdictions. Please read my disclaimers page before taking any action. And then, don't take any action based on what I wrote.

Creative Commons logo with the text 'Some Rights Reserved' and three symbols representing attribution, non-commercial use, and share alike.

Compliance Building - by Doug Cornelius is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.

© 2026 Compliance Building | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme