Skip to content

Compliance Building

Doug Cornelius on compliance for private equity real estate

Menu
  • Home
  • About
    • About
    • About Doug
    • About This Website
    • Why I Blog
    • Speaking Engagements
    • Contact
    • Publications
  • Archives
    • Topic Archive
    • Book Reviews
    • Most Popular
  • Subscribe
  • Disclaimers
    • Disclaimers
    • Policies and Procedures
    • Use of Site Content
    • Comments
    • FTC Disclosure
Menu

TRID: The Reason I Drink

Posted on May 31, 2016 by Doug Cornelius
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The Wall Street Journal dedicated some front page space to compliance professionals: Inside Enforcers Shake Up Bank Culture. It paints a stark picture of the regulatory pressure on banks.

private placement

There were many factors that lead to the 2008 Great Recession. Most people agree that a lack of oversight by regulators on the banks under their supervision contributed to the crash and the government bailout. The 2010 Dodd-Frank law was supposed to make the banking system safer than it was.

It has made banking harder and more complex.

Dodd-Frank was 200 pages of law that has lead to another 22,000 pages of regulatory requirements. Those requirements have spawned the fastest-growing component of the financial sector. Banks have hired tens of thousands of new compliance staff to implement and operate within in the new regulatory environment. The six largest U.S. banks spent at least $70.2 billion on regulatory compliance in 2013 which is double the $34.7 billion spent in 2007, according to a study by Federal Financial Analytics Inc.

Among the new federal banking regulations there is one that financial wonks call “TRID,” the TILA-Respa Integrated Disclosure rule.

Attendees at a recent training school here for bank compliance staff, who must learn and enforce such rules, said they deciphered TRID’s true meaning: “The reason I drink.”

According to the story, regulators sometimes struggle to decipher new rules the same way bank and their compliance professionals do. An interviewee discusses  a months long discussion between the bank and regulators over whether it should let customers pay ahead on mortgages. And if they did, would the bank consider borrowers delinquent if they later missed a month?

Another bank official noted  that it isn’t uncommon for regulators from different agencies to issue conflicting opinions. One of that bank’s regulators requested an exam.  Two weeks later, another regulatory agency requested an exam. The two regualtors came back with different results.

TRID

Sources:

Nuns With Guns: The Strange Day-to-Day Struggles Between Bankers and Regulators by Kristen Grind and Emily Glazer in the Wall Street Journal

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search for Stuff

Recent Stories

  • Compliance Bricks and Mortar for January 9
  • “Small”: I Don’t Think You Know What That Means
  • CFTC is Saying Goodbye to Private Funds
  • New York’s LLC Transparency Act Will Remain Limited
  • SEC and CFTC With Only Republicans
  • Compliance Books from 2025
  • Happy New Year
  • The One That Can Drive You and Give You Investment Advice
  • The One with the Foreclosure and OFAC Sanctions
  • Can Precious Gem Buying Being Securities Fraud?

Fight Cancer

Please support my Pan-Mass Challenge
Make a donation to fight cancer. donate.pmc.org/DC0176
pan-mass challenge badge

I am a lawyer, but I am not your lawyer. Since I’m a lawyer, this website may be considered attorney advertising under the ethical rules of certain jurisdictions. Please read my disclaimers page before taking any action. And then, don't take any action based on what I wrote.

Creative Commons logo with the text 'Some Rights Reserved' and three symbols representing attribution, non-commercial use, and share alike.

Compliance Building - by Doug Cornelius is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.