Skip to content

Compliance Building

Doug Cornelius on compliance for private equity real estate

Menu
  • Home
  • About
    • About
    • About Doug
    • About This Website
    • Why I Blog
    • Speaking Engagements
    • Contact
    • Publications
  • Archives
    • Topic Archive
    • Book Reviews
    • Most Popular
  • Subscribe
  • Disclaimers
    • Disclaimers
    • Policies and Procedures
    • Use of Site Content
    • Comments
    • FTC Disclosure
Menu

Love For Your Mother Can Be Insider Trading

Posted on April 14, 2016 by Doug Cornelius
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Lawrencia Afriyie took some risky bets in the market. She bought out-of-the-money options, but made $1.5 million in profits. It just so happens that her son, John, worked for for an investment firm that had material non-public information on the target of those options.

Cash in the grass.

According to the SEC complaint, John Afriyie worked at an investment firm involved in a going private deal for ADT. He accessed documents that were designated “confidential” or several variations of confidential. He must have seen a golden opportunity to make some money on the side.

Since Mr. Afriyie had signed the investment firm’s Code of Business Ethics that prohibits trading on material, non-public information, he could not trade on the information.

Mysteriously, his mother, Lawrencia, bought 2,279 options on ADT from January 28 through February 12. The options were out of the money, with strike prices between $32 and $34 a share, while the stock was trading between $24 and $28. She was most of the trading activity on these options on many days during that period.

On February 16, ADT announced its acquisition at a price of $42. Lawrencia made a profit of $1.5 million on $24,000 in options.

Based on the trading activity in Lawrencia’s account, I would assume the compliance officers on her account saw a big red flag: extremely well timed option trades just prior to a major announcement. The complaint does not say so, but I assume that this option trading was unusual for her account.

Then it was up to the regulators to tie her to the source of information. Did she rat out her son and tell the regulators that it was him trading on her account? Her son had just made her a big pile of cash.

Probably not. FINRA would have seen the suspicious name to the firms involved in the transaction. Someone at the investment firm would have matched the last names and asked John what his mother’s name was.  Then compliance would have looked closer, reported the problem and booted him out the door in short order.

Now the SEC has brought charges to recover the gains and the DOJ has brought criminal charges.

Sources:

  • SEC: Research Analyst Is Insider Trading in Mother’s Brokerage Account
  • SEC complaint
  • Former New York analyst charged with insider trading on ADT deal by Nate Raymond in Reuters

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search for Stuff

Recent Stories

  • Model Fees Versus Actual Fees in Marketing
  • Compliance Bricks and Mortar for January 16
  • Staff Report on Capital-Raising Dynamics
  • Compliance Bricks and Mortar for January 9
  • “Small”: I Don’t Think You Know What That Means
  • CFTC is Saying Goodbye to Private Funds
  • New York’s LLC Transparency Act Will Remain Limited
  • SEC and CFTC With Only Republicans
  • Compliance Books from 2025
  • Happy New Year

Fight Cancer

Please support my Pan-Mass Challenge
Make a donation to fight cancer. donate.pmc.org/DC0176
pan-mass challenge badge

I am a lawyer, but I am not your lawyer. Since I’m a lawyer, this website may be considered attorney advertising under the ethical rules of certain jurisdictions. Please read my disclaimers page before taking any action. And then, don't take any action based on what I wrote.

Creative Commons logo with the text 'Some Rights Reserved' and three symbols representing attribution, non-commercial use, and share alike.

Compliance Building - by Doug Cornelius is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.