Skip to content

Compliance Building

Doug Cornelius on compliance for private equity real estate

Menu
  • Home
  • About
    • About
    • About Doug
    • About This Website
    • Why I Blog
    • Speaking Engagements
    • Contact
    • Publications
  • Archives
    • Topic Archive
    • Book Reviews
    • Most Popular
  • Subscribe
  • Disclaimers
    • Disclaimers
    • Policies and Procedures
    • Use of Site Content
    • Comments
    • FTC Disclosure
Menu

Compliance Bricks and Mortar for October 2

Posted on October 2, 2015October 1, 2015 by Doug Cornelius
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

These are some of the compliance-related stories that recently caught my attention.

800px-Surfaces_brick_wall_with_mortar_closeup_view


 

The Curious Incident of the ‘Life Coach’ and the Press Release by Bruce Carton in Compliance Week

As I’ve observed before, the SEC loves to craft press release headlines that feature defendants’ interesting or high-profile jobs. For example, past SEC headline highlights include:

  • “Commission Settles with Motivational Speaker“
  • “SEC Charges Nationally Known Psychic in Multi-Million Dollar Securities Fraud“
  • “SEC Charges Former Professional Baseball Player Doug DeCinces and Three Others with Insider Trading“
  • “SEC Charges College Football Hall of Fame Coach in $80 Million Ponzi Scheme“

All of this makes it quite mystifying to me how the SEC’s case filed last week…[More]


Where I Think the Yates DOJ Memo Will Take Us by Roy Snell in SCCE’s Compliance & Ethics Blog

On one side of the room will be top leadership; on the other, the lead investigators. The DOJ may ask that the Board Chair be involved. At some point during the meeting, the DOJ will share their recent memo/policy that, paraphrased, states, “If you turn over internal investigations of individuals involved in the alleged wrongdoing, you will get more credit.” (“More credit” is a euphemism for, in some cases, millions of dollars in reduced penalties.) But beyond the discussion of credit, leadership will need to be prepared for a discussion of discipline.[More…]


Reflections on the Hitachi FCPA Enforcement Action by Thomas R. Fox in FCPA Compliance & Ethics

Perhaps the most interesting aspect of the Hitachi matter is that it involved bribery of a political party, the African National Congress (ANC). The SEC Press Release stated, “Hitachi sold a 25-percent stake in a South African subsidiary to a company serving as a front for the ANC. This arrangement gave the front company and the ANC the ability to share in the profits from any power station contracts that Hitachi secured. Hitachi was ultimately awarded two contracts to build power stations in South Africa and paid the ANC’s front company approximately $5 million in “dividends” based on profits derived from the contracts. Through a separate, undisclosed arrangement, Hitachi paid the front company an additional $1 million in “success fee”.”[More…]


The Volcker Rule as Structural Law by John C. Coates in the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation

Alongside these banking laws, another set of structural laws grew in importance in the 20th century: administrative law—the body of statutes and court doctrines channeling and controlling the use of delegated law-making power by government officials and agencies. To control and improve the functioning of agencies, Congress adopted a number of legal constraints, including the Administrative Procedures Act, which together with an assertive judiciary gives private actors the ability to challenge regulation in court. To this list, cost-benefit analysis (CBA) has been increasingly advanced—in advocacy, in Congress, and in court—as an additional tool for improving financial regulations, and holding financial regulatory agencies accountable to the public. [More…]


The Compliance Dangers of Cheerleaders and Nay-Sayers by Michael Volkov in Corruption, Crime & Compliance

Many senior executives are smart people –we all understand that. But too often senor executives embrace an interpersonal style of cheerleading. It allows them to appear to be on the “team” and prevent them from “rocking the boat.” Unfortunately, such an attitude prevents them from being a value add and problem solver for real management issues. [More…]


 

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search for Stuff

Recent Stories

  • Compliance Bricks and Mortar for January 16
  • Staff Report on Capital-Raising Dynamics
  • Compliance Bricks and Mortar for January 9
  • “Small”: I Don’t Think You Know What That Means
  • CFTC is Saying Goodbye to Private Funds
  • New York’s LLC Transparency Act Will Remain Limited
  • SEC and CFTC With Only Republicans
  • Compliance Books from 2025
  • Happy New Year
  • The One That Can Drive You and Give You Investment Advice

Fight Cancer

Please support my Pan-Mass Challenge
Make a donation to fight cancer. donate.pmc.org/DC0176
pan-mass challenge badge

I am a lawyer, but I am not your lawyer. Since I’m a lawyer, this website may be considered attorney advertising under the ethical rules of certain jurisdictions. Please read my disclaimers page before taking any action. And then, don't take any action based on what I wrote.

Creative Commons logo with the text 'Some Rights Reserved' and three symbols representing attribution, non-commercial use, and share alike.

Compliance Building - by Doug Cornelius is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.