Skip to content

Compliance Building

Doug Cornelius on compliance for private equity real estate

Menu
  • Home
  • About
    • About
    • About Doug
    • About This Website
    • Why I Blog
    • Speaking Engagements
    • Contact
    • Publications
  • Archives
    • Topic Archive
    • Book Reviews
    • Most Popular
  • Subscribe
  • Disclaimers
    • Disclaimers
    • Policies and Procedures
    • Use of Site Content
    • Comments
    • FTC Disclosure
Menu

Cheating In Ethics Class

Posted on January 12, 2015 by Doug Cornelius
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Dartmouth_logo

Is this the worst ethics teacher?

64 Dartmouth Students Charged With Cheating In Ethics Class

According to the story, attendance in religion professor Randall Balmer’s “Sports, Ethics and Religion” was measured using handheld devices known as “clickers.” In late October, some students passed their clickers to fellow classmates. Those classmates then used the clickers to answer questions which made it appear as though they were present in class.

The ethics course was originally intended to help student-athletes. In its second year, the class grew to more than 280 students. Attendance and cheating became a problem.

Balmer discovered the problem when he noticed a discrepancy in the number of student responses to in-class questions using handheld clickers and the number of students in the classroom on Oct. 30, 2014. Balmer presented both a hard copy version and a clicker version of certain questions, and noted that 43 students did not respond to the paper version of the questions but did respond using clickers.

Obviously the students are at fault for breaking the school’s honor code. Clearly, professor Balmer did not make an impression on his students’ ethics during the first few classes. They felt they could cheat and still get a good grade.

Sources:

  • 64 Dartmouth Students Charged With Cheating In Ethics Class
  • Dartmouth: 64 Students Cheated by Rob Wolfe in Valley News
  • Sixty-four students charged with honor code violations by Parker Richards in The Dartmouth

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search for Stuff

Recent Stories

  • No Insider Trading Too Small
  • Cancel-Rebill and Screw Your Clients
  • New Risk Alert on Investment Adviser Annual Compliance Reviews
  • When Compliance Says “Do It”, But the Firm Doesn’t
  • Extending Compliance Dates for Form PF
  • The Massive Scope of Digital Asset Investment Scams
  • SEC Proposes Rescission of Political Contribution Rule for Investment Advisers
  • Is Failure to Disclose Misappropriation Committing Securities Fraud?
  • SEC Sweep of Fake Form ADV Filers
  • New Custody Rule Is On Its Way

Fight Cancer

Please support my Pan-Mass Challenge
Make a donation to fight cancer. donate.pmc.org/DC0176
pan-mass challenge badge

I am a lawyer, but I am not your lawyer. Since I’m a lawyer, this website may be considered attorney advertising under the ethical rules of certain jurisdictions. Please read my disclaimers page before taking any action. And then, don't take any action based on what I wrote.

Creative Commons logo with the text 'Some Rights Reserved' and three symbols representing attribution, non-commercial use, and share alike.

Compliance Building - by Doug Cornelius is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.

© 2026 Compliance Building | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme