Skip to content

Compliance Building

Doug Cornelius on compliance for private equity real estate

Menu
  • Home
  • About
    • About
    • About Doug
    • About This Website
    • Why I Blog
    • Speaking Engagements
    • Contact
    • Publications
  • Archives
    • Topic Archive
    • Book Reviews
    • Most Popular
  • Subscribe
  • Disclaimers
    • Disclaimers
    • Policies and Procedures
    • Use of Site Content
    • Comments
    • FTC Disclosure
Menu

SEC Examination and Enforcement Priorities

Posted on October 28, 2014October 29, 2014 by Doug Cornelius
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

IMG_2059[1]

These are my notes from the NRS Fall Compliance Conference.

John Walsh, Sutherland
Karol Pollock, SEC Deputy Associate Regional Director (Exams)

Karol outlined the examination process.

1. You get a phone call. But prior to the phone call, the examiners will have done some background research, looking at the firms ADV, public website and an internet search.

2. You get a document request. The examiners will try to tailor it to the particular firm. A quick response is a good sign. A delay in getting materials is a red flag.

3. After the exam you will get a summary letter. This used to be called the deficiency letter. The SEC may go back to calling it a deficiency letter.

4. Post exam the examiners will work with the Division of Investment Management. The goal is to get a bigger enforcement footprint.

OCIE has expanded its mission. It is not a branch of enforcement. It acts as the eyes and ears of the Commission. It’s the first to see new trends. It also comments on rulemakings.

Here is a preview of the 2015 exam priorities. These are not final yet, but are likely to end up in this year’s disclosure.

Perennial priorities

  • Safety of client assets and custody
  • Conflicts inherent in IA firms
  • Marketing and performance disclosure

Initiatives

  • Never before examined
  • Fixed income investment companies. The SEC is looking ahead to rising interest rates. The SEC wants to make sure these investment products are making proper disclosures about what may happen with rising rates.
  • Private fund advisers. The exam staff finds them “interesting.” There is a clash with organizations that are not used to regulatory exams.
  • Retirement vehicles and rollovers
  • Dual registrants. Is each side aware of the different compliance requirements. BDs “gone wild” when they switch to IA and are no longer oppressed by the FINRA manual.

Potential New Initiatives

  • ETFs – They increasing have a narrow niche and increasing complexity. The SEC wants to make sure that there are proper disclosures and sales suitability,
  • Accuracy of ADV. The SEC is seeing adviser inflate assets to stay registered with the SEC and avoid the transfer to state regulation.
  • False Addresses. The SEC is seeing adviser use a false Wyoming address to get SEC registration.
  • Proxy adviser. Reviewing recommendations and voting for investors.

There was a discussion of the “may” versus “will” case. If you are actually doing something all the time, don’t say you may do it.

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search for Stuff

Recent Stories

  • Compliance Bricks and Mortar for January 9
  • “Small”: I Don’t Think You Know What That Means
  • CFTC is Saying Goodbye to Private Funds
  • New York’s LLC Transparency Act Will Remain Limited
  • SEC and CFTC With Only Republicans
  • Compliance Books from 2025
  • Happy New Year
  • The One That Can Drive You and Give You Investment Advice
  • The One with the Foreclosure and OFAC Sanctions
  • Can Precious Gem Buying Being Securities Fraud?

Fight Cancer

Please support my Pan-Mass Challenge
Make a donation to fight cancer. donate.pmc.org/DC0176
pan-mass challenge badge

I am a lawyer, but I am not your lawyer. Since I’m a lawyer, this website may be considered attorney advertising under the ethical rules of certain jurisdictions. Please read my disclaimers page before taking any action. And then, don't take any action based on what I wrote.

Creative Commons logo with the text 'Some Rights Reserved' and three symbols representing attribution, non-commercial use, and share alike.

Compliance Building - by Doug Cornelius is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.