Skip to content

Compliance Building

Doug Cornelius on compliance for private equity real estate

Menu
  • Home
  • About
    • About
    • About Doug
    • About This Website
    • Why I Blog
    • Speaking Engagements
    • Contact
    • Publications
  • Archives
    • Topic Archive
    • Book Reviews
    • Most Popular
  • Subscribe
  • Disclaimers
    • Disclaimers
    • Policies and Procedures
    • Use of Site Content
    • Comments
    • FTC Disclosure
Menu

Association for Corporate Growth’s Compliance & Regulatory Survey

Posted on October 22, 2014October 21, 2014 by Doug Cornelius
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

association of corporate growth

The Association for Corporate Growth released a report identifying the top compliance and regulatory concerns impacting small and midsize private equity firms. The results are unsurprising, but reinforce concerns.

The top five regulatory issues were found to be:

  • SEC Examinations (75%)
  • Investment Adviser Act Compliance (66%)
  • Valuation Issues (58%)
  • General Solicitation rules (54%)
  • Legislation (tax reform, carried interest) (50%)
  • Allocation of Fees and Expenses (50%)

The Investment Adviser Act compliance item included custody, recordkeeping and reporting. I’m not sure if that includes marketing limitations.

I was surprised that political contributions and the pay-to-play regulations only gathered 24.6%. That’s the one that keeps me up at night.

I was not surprised that SEC examination was the top vote-getter. An exam is a pain in the neck and there can only be bad things from it. No investor is going to make a decision because the firm had a positive exam. But you may lose a potential investor if you have a bad exam.

ACG also probed deeper on SEC examinations. Of the 158 votes for that concern, 57 had been examined. Many of the firms who indicated they were examined in 2012 and early 2013 indicated that their examiners were not familiar with the private equity business model. Those firms examined in 2014 generally indicated that their examination was conducted efficiently, and/or they comment that the examiners appeared familiar with private equity. Only one person commented that the examiners were more combative than necessary.

Sources:

  • ACG SEC Task Survey: “A Call to Action” (.pdf)

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search for Stuff

Recent Stories

  • The SEC 2026 Rulemaking Agenda
  • The Alignment Gap: Rethinking Costs in Private Equity Fund Formation
  • PERE 100 and SEC Registration
  • Neither Admit Nor Deny To Be No Longer
  • What Will Form PF Look Like Next Year?
  • Is It a Chipset or Is It a Security?
  • When the Lawyer Is Breaking Bad
  • Will Investors Have an Appetite for Semi-Annual Reporting?
  • Special Forces Trading on Insider Knowledge
  • Prediction Markets and Compliance Programs

Fight Cancer

Please support my Pan-Mass Challenge
Make a donation to fight cancer. donate.pmc.org/DC0176
pan-mass challenge badge

I am a lawyer, but I am not your lawyer. Since I’m a lawyer, this website may be considered attorney advertising under the ethical rules of certain jurisdictions. Please read my disclaimers page before taking any action. And then, don't take any action based on what I wrote.

Creative Commons logo with the text 'Some Rights Reserved' and three symbols representing attribution, non-commercial use, and share alike.

Compliance Building - by Doug Cornelius is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.