Skip to content

Compliance Building

Doug Cornelius on compliance for private equity real estate

Menu
  • Home
  • About
    • About
    • About Doug
    • About This Website
    • Why I Blog
    • Speaking Engagements
    • Contact
    • Publications
  • Archives
    • Topic Archive
    • Book Reviews
    • Most Popular
  • Subscribe
  • Disclaimers
    • Disclaimers
    • Policies and Procedures
    • Use of Site Content
    • Comments
    • FTC Disclosure
Menu

Compliance Failures and Performance Measure

Posted on July 22, 2014July 22, 2014 by Doug Cornelius
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

compliance and port of los angeles

Progress Rail is under criminal investigation for failures in its railcar and locomotive repairs operation. Investigators claim that it was charging owners of rail equipment for making unnecessary repairs and replacements. There is also an environmental claim because the investigation indicates that workers were dumping parts in the ocean to hide them from auditors. That environmental claim caught the attention of what otherwise may have been a billing dispute.

Railcar owners and the railroads hire Progress Rail to make repairs or replace worn brake shoes, wheels and other components. Ten thousand railcars a month roll into the Port of Los Angeles County, the busiest port in the United States. While here, most are inspected by Progress Rail.

Progress Rail bills the railcar owners for repairs and looks to employee performance based on the billables they generate. According to early reports of investigators, managers made it clear that workers could lose their jobs if they didn’t generate enough repair revenue.

What happens on a day when the railcars coming thorugh are all in good shape? Make repair work: smash something, remove a bolt, or report a missing part you remove.

There are auditors that review operations to try to keep Progress Rail’s employees honest.

What is the issue from a compliance perspective? Culture.

Middle management was focused on increasing revenue and instilled this focus on its employees. The focus should have been on keeping the railcars well-maintained. Part of the problem is ties back to how the railcar owners structure their contracts with Progress Rail. Presumably they pay for work done, instead of a fee based on performance of their railcars.

Sources:

  • Caterpillar Probed for Possibly Dumping Train Parts in Pacific Ocean by James R. Hagerty and Bob Tita in the Wall Street Journal
  • Workers at Caterpillar Say Train Repairs Were Often Bogus by James R. Hagerty and Bob Tita in the Wall Street Journal

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search for Stuff

Recent Stories

  • Model Fees Versus Actual Fees in Marketing
  • Compliance Bricks and Mortar for January 16
  • Staff Report on Capital-Raising Dynamics
  • Compliance Bricks and Mortar for January 9
  • “Small”: I Don’t Think You Know What That Means
  • CFTC is Saying Goodbye to Private Funds
  • New York’s LLC Transparency Act Will Remain Limited
  • SEC and CFTC With Only Republicans
  • Compliance Books from 2025
  • Happy New Year

Fight Cancer

Please support my Pan-Mass Challenge
Make a donation to fight cancer. donate.pmc.org/DC0176
pan-mass challenge badge

I am a lawyer, but I am not your lawyer. Since I’m a lawyer, this website may be considered attorney advertising under the ethical rules of certain jurisdictions. Please read my disclaimers page before taking any action. And then, don't take any action based on what I wrote.

Creative Commons logo with the text 'Some Rights Reserved' and three symbols representing attribution, non-commercial use, and share alike.

Compliance Building - by Doug Cornelius is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.