Skip to content

Compliance Building

Doug Cornelius on compliance for private equity real estate

Menu
  • Home
  • About
    • About
    • About Doug
    • About This Website
    • Why I Blog
    • Speaking Engagements
    • Contact
    • Publications
  • Archives
    • Topic Archive
    • Book Reviews
    • Most Popular
  • Subscribe
  • Disclaimers
    • Disclaimers
    • Policies and Procedures
    • Use of Site Content
    • Comments
    • FTC Disclosure
Menu

The New SEC Whistleblower Rule

Posted on May 26, 2011March 17, 2013 by Doug Cornelius
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In a blow to the efforts of internal compliance, the SEC will let corporate whistle-blowers collect a percentage of penalties when they report financial wrongdoing, even when they bypass companies’ internal complaint systems.

“For an agency with limited resources like the SEC, it is critical to be able to leverage the resources of people who may have first-hand information about violations of the securities laws,” said SEC Chairman Mary L. Schapiro. “While the SEC has a history of receiving a high volume of tips and complaints, the quality of the tips we have received has been better since Dodd-Frank became law. We expect this trend to continue, and these final rules map out simplified and transparent procedures for whistleblowers to provide us critical information.”

The small life ring the SEC threw to internal compliance is that the amount of the amount will be affected by how the person dealt with internal compliance. The amount of the award can be increased if the person reported the problem through internal compliance procedures and decreased if the person interfered with internal compliance or reporting systems.

A May 4 opinion from Judge Leonard Sand held that Dodd-Frank says a person has to report wrongdoing to the SEC — or be able to seek protection under other laws — before receiving legal sanctuary.

The final rule won’t provide protections to those who don’t report to the SEC, reinforcing the court’s interpretation.

While there is lots of discussion around provision providing the incentive to go to the SEC, there is also a question of the anti-retaliation protections. In the recent Egan v. TradingScreen case, a court found that the employee needs to go to the SEC get the statutory anti-retaliation protection.

For private companies, the Egan case also emphasized the point that the whistleblower provisions of Section 806 only apply to public companies subject to the Exchange Act. The employee alleged that Trading Screen was planning to public and should be subject. That didn’t work. He tried to another tactic that since it was a SEC registered broker-dealer it should be subject. The judge didn’t accept that argument either.

Sources:

  • SEC Adopts Rules to Establish Whistleblower Program – SEC Press Release
  • SEC Release 34-64545 Implementation of the Whistleblower Provisions of Section 21F of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (.pdf) – Final Rule
  • “Whistleblower skirmish by Kaja Whitehouse in the New York Post
  • SEC Approves Whistle-Blower Rules Letting Workers Bypass Internal Systems By Jesse Hamilton in Bloomberg
  • Whistleblower Advocates Flip The Script On Internal Reporting by Joe Palazzolo in WSJ.com’s Corruption Currents
  • The Word is “Whistleblower” Kevin LaCroix in the D&O Diary
  • Opinion and Order in Egan v. Trading Screen (.pdf)

Image: Qiqi Green Whistle 8-16-09 3 by Steven Depolo
CC BY 2.0

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

1 thought on “The New SEC Whistleblower Rule”

  1. Pingback: A Weekend of Whistleblowing | Compliance Building

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search for Stuff

Recent Stories

  • SEC Enforcement Results for FY 2025
  • Proposed Fundamental Reforms to AML Programs
  • Is It a Truck or a Security?
  • The One with Low IQ from Pet IQ
  • The Downsizing of the SEC
  • When “Today” Is Not all of “Today”
  • Compliance Bricks and Mortar for March 27
  • The One Where Theory Meets Reality
  • When the COVID Pandemic Hits Your Valuation
  • SEC’s Private Markets Roundtable

Fight Cancer

Please support my Pan-Mass Challenge
Make a donation to fight cancer. donate.pmc.org/DC0176
pan-mass challenge badge

I am a lawyer, but I am not your lawyer. Since I’m a lawyer, this website may be considered attorney advertising under the ethical rules of certain jurisdictions. Please read my disclaimers page before taking any action. And then, don't take any action based on what I wrote.

Creative Commons logo with the text 'Some Rights Reserved' and three symbols representing attribution, non-commercial use, and share alike.

Compliance Building - by Doug Cornelius is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.