Skip to content

Compliance Building

Doug Cornelius on compliance for private equity real estate

Menu
  • Home
  • About
    • About
    • About Doug
    • About This Website
    • Why I Blog
    • Speaking Engagements
    • Contact
    • Publications
  • Archives
    • Topic Archive
    • Book Reviews
    • Most Popular
  • Subscribe
  • Disclaimers
    • Disclaimers
    • Policies and Procedures
    • Use of Site Content
    • Comments
    • FTC Disclosure
Menu

Compliance Bits and Pieces for January 8

Posted on January 8, 2010January 6, 2010 by Doug Cornelius
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Here are some interesting stories from the past week:

BAE Bribe Suit Tossed On Appeal from The FCPA Blog

The decision is a big win for BAE (and all U.K. companies threatened with shareholder litigation in the U.S.). But it’s another setback for plaintiffs who bring claims based on allegations that, if true, would violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

Top Risks of 2010

If the 2009 top risks were first and foremost about developed states having their wits sufficiently about them to get through the financial crisis (with the US Congress leading the pack), as the world now emerges from recession the risks begin to shift to the challenges created by the emergence of a new global order–developed vs. developing states, the old unipolar system vs. the emerging non-polar one, and the old dominant globalized system of regulated free market capitalism vs. the growing strength of state capitalism.

Study debunks analyst recommendations myth

The study, conducted by Dr. Oya Altınkılıç of the University of Pittsburgh and Dr. Robert Hansen and Vadim Balashov of Tulane University, builds on a previous study by Altınkılıç and Hansen that had found analyst recommendations “tend to piggyback on the news” and are relatively “uninformative.”

Deducting Disgorgements from The FCPA Blog

The lesson is that FCPA-related disgorgements — which have reached hundreds of millions of dollars — may be deductible. It depends chiefly on what the SEC intends and how the agreement describing the disgorgement is written to reflect that intent.

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search for Stuff

Recent Stories

  • BlueSky Eagle and the Ghost Filing
  • Updates to the SEC Enforcement Manual
  • When Drug Lords Want Their Kids to Be Better Athletes
  • Insider Trading Before Bankruptcy
  • Relief for ’40 Act Funds
  • Artificial Intelligence Produced Materials are Not Protected by Privilege
  • FINRA Looks to Allow Projected Performance
  • California’s Fair Investment Practices by Venture Capital Companies
  • Compliance Bricks and Mortar for January 30
  • Interpreter Insider Trading

Fight Cancer

Please support my Pan-Mass Challenge
Make a donation to fight cancer. donate.pmc.org/DC0176
pan-mass challenge badge

I am a lawyer, but I am not your lawyer. Since I’m a lawyer, this website may be considered attorney advertising under the ethical rules of certain jurisdictions. Please read my disclaimers page before taking any action. And then, don't take any action based on what I wrote.

Creative Commons logo with the text 'Some Rights Reserved' and three symbols representing attribution, non-commercial use, and share alike.

Compliance Building - by Doug Cornelius is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.