Skip to content

Compliance Building

Doug Cornelius on compliance for private equity real estate

Menu
  • Home
  • About
    • About
    • About Doug
    • About This Website
    • Why I Blog
    • Speaking Engagements
    • Contact
    • Publications
  • Archives
    • Topic Archive
    • Book Reviews
    • Most Popular
  • Subscribe
  • Disclaimers
    • Disclaimers
    • Policies and Procedures
    • Use of Site Content
    • Comments
    • FTC Disclosure
Menu

Massachusetts Amends Strict Data Privacy Law (Again)

Posted on August 18, 2009October 2, 2013 by Doug Cornelius
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Massachusetts-State-House

UPDATE: Another revision was published on November 5, 2009. See: Massachusetts Amends Its Strict Data Privacy Law (Yet, Again)

The Massachusetts’ Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation has decided to amend the strict data privacy law and extend the deadline for compliance. This is yet another amendment to the regulations. The last amendment had extended the compliance deadline to January 1, 2010.

In keeping with Governor Deval Patrick’s commitment to balancing consumer protection with the needs of small business owners, the adjustments to Massachusetts’ identity theft regulations allow some flexibility in compliance by small businesses. The regulations now have a risk-based approach that may make it easier on small businesses that may not handle a lot of personal information about customers. Under a risk-based approach, a business, in developing a written security program, can take into account its size, nature of its business, the kinds of records it maintains, and the risk of identity theft posed by its operations.

Key amendments to 201 CMR 17.00 include:

Section 17.01 (1) Purpose of the regulation was amended to include language from M.G.L. 93H.

Section 17.01 (2) Scope of the regulations was revised to cover “persons who own or license personal information”. Section removes previous regulatory language related to those that “store or maintain personal information”.

Section 17.02 Encryption definition was amended to be technology neutral. A definition for the term “owns and licenses” was added to focus the protection of personal information in “connection with the provision of goods or services or in connection with employment”. A new definition for the term “service provider” was added.

Section 17.03 (1) Duty to protect rules look to address size and scope of a firm within the development and implementation of a written information security plan. (2) Amends and removes some requirements for the written information security plan. (f) Amends third party vendor rules and provides a two year window relative to contracts and requirements for compliance.

Section 17.04 Amends computer requirements for persons that own or license personal information to develop a written information security plan “that at a minimum, and to extent technologically feasible, shall have the following elements”.

Section 17.05 Amends the effective date of the regulations to March 1, 2010.

There will be a hearing on the revised regulations commencing at 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday September 22, 2009, in Room No. 5-6, Second Floor of the Transportation Building, Ten Park Plaza Boston, Massachusetts 02116. Interested parties will be afforded a reasonable opportunity at the hearing to present oral or written testimony. Written comments will be accepted up to the close of business on September 25, 2009. Such written comments may be mailed to: Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation, 10 Park Plaza, Suite 5170, Boston, MA 02116, Attention: Jason Egan, Deputy General Counsel, or e-mailed to Jason.Egan@state.ma.us.

References:

  • Revised Regulations
  • Press Release: Small-Business Considerations Reflected in Massachusetts’ Revised ID Theft Regulations
  • State Revises Data Security Regulations from Associated Industries of Massachusetts
  • 201 CMR 17 FAQ: Updates to Massachusetts data protection law by Alex Howard for SearchCompliance.com

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

7 thoughts on “Massachusetts Amends Strict Data Privacy Law (Again)”

  1. Patrick Engelman says:
    August 21, 2009 at 2:10 pm

    One omission from their FAQ on the changes is the fact that the 3rd party contract requirement (which had been removed in an earlier revision) has been re-added — this basically says that any time a third party has access to personal information, that third party must be contractually obligated to protect that information.

    Reply
    1. Anonymous says:
      January 28, 2010 at 1:12 pm

      Hi Patrick,

      It’s Brian Wheeler from WBZNewsRadio Radio in Boston. I’d like to ask you a few questions about this law an your experience in compliance assistance. You can reach me at 617-787-7591.

      Brian

      Reply
  2. Pingback: Massachusetts Amends Its Strict Data Privacy Law (Yet, Again) | Compliance Building
  3. Pingback: Today is the Deadline for the Massachusetts Data Privacy Law | Compliance Building
  4. Jennifer says:
    March 17, 2010 at 10:50 am

    Does this law apply to Vermont businesses who employee Massachusetts residents?

    Thank you.
    Jennifer LoCascio

    Reply
  5. Jennifer says:
    March 17, 2010 at 10:51 am

    Does this law affect Vermont businesses with Mass residents?

    Reply
    1. Doug Cornelius says:
      March 17, 2010 at 11:04 am

      I assume that you have the social security numbers for those Massachusetts residents. That means it applies to you and that information.

      Reply

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search for Stuff

Recent Stories

  • California’s Fair Investment Practices by Venture Capital Companies
  • Compliance Bricks and Mortar for January 30
  • Interpreter Insider Trading
  • Things not to put in Advisory Contracts – Hedges
  • Weekend Reading: Bad Company
  • Things to Not Put in an Advisory Agreement – Assignment Rights
  • Congressional Stock Trading and Private Insider Trading
  • Model Fees Versus Actual Fees in Marketing
  • Compliance Bricks and Mortar for January 16
  • Staff Report on Capital-Raising Dynamics

Fight Cancer

Please support my Pan-Mass Challenge
Make a donation to fight cancer. donate.pmc.org/DC0176
pan-mass challenge badge

I am a lawyer, but I am not your lawyer. Since I’m a lawyer, this website may be considered attorney advertising under the ethical rules of certain jurisdictions. Please read my disclaimers page before taking any action. And then, don't take any action based on what I wrote.

Creative Commons logo with the text 'Some Rights Reserved' and three symbols representing attribution, non-commercial use, and share alike.

Compliance Building - by Doug Cornelius is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.