Skip to content

Compliance Building

Doug Cornelius on compliance for private equity real estate

Menu
  • Home
  • About
    • About
    • About Doug
    • About This Website
    • Why I Blog
    • Speaking Engagements
    • Contact
    • Publications
  • Archives
    • Topic Archive
    • Book Reviews
    • Most Popular
  • Subscribe
  • Disclaimers
    • Disclaimers
    • Policies and Procedures
    • Use of Site Content
    • Comments
    • FTC Disclosure
Menu

The SEC’s Radical Disclosure Overhaul

Posted on June 3, 2009June 3, 2009 by Doug Cornelius
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

compliance-week-sepia

My notes, live, from Dr. William Lutz on The SEC’s Radical Disclosure Overhaul. (Disclaimer: The presentation represents the views of Dr. Lutz and not necessarily the views of the SEC.)

He started off with a definition of “Information”: That which reduces uncertainty. (From Shannon and Weaver’s  Mathematical Theory of Communication) If it’s not information, it’s noise. You only want the information that you want.

He says the 10-Q is noise. Lots and lots of noise. Plus there is all the trouble of searching in EDGAR to find the filing. He likes the Hittites tablets that last hundreds of years. There is no difference between the Library of Alexandria and EDGAR. Both have data that are locked down and inaccessible, full of noise. In looking at a 10K for a company in 1996 it was 263 pages. In 2009, it was 1,376 pages.

How do you give investors access to high quality information?

Each year, the SEC collects the address of the filing company 14 times. And not always in the same format.

He advocates having a “company file” with a central repository of information: static company information, periodic information and transaction information. The information needs to be structured and accessible. He then said the magic word: XBLR.

He pointed out that Israel has already deployed this system with true electronic filing. Not just a paper filing turned into text, but the tagging of data to the system. It allows a mash-up of different information from different companies to allow for easier manipulations of the data. he cited an example of finding an insider trading scandal using this data tagging.

This creates more transparency. With this information, everyone can be an accountant and understand the finances of a company. And easily compare that information with other companies.

How do we give investors access to the data they need? In a way that they can use the data?

There is a need to move from a print society to an information society.

More information:

  • The 21st Century Disclosure Initiative
  • Toward Greater Transparency: Modernizing the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Disclosure System(.pdf) report of The 21st Century Disclosure Initiative

(These notes are taken live, so I apologize if I left out anything or misquoted someone. Please forgive any typos or grammatical errors.)

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search for Stuff

Recent Stories

  • PERE 100 and SEC Registration
  • Neither Admit Nor Deny To Be No Longer
  • What Will Form PF Look Like Next Year?
  • Is It a Chipset or Is It a Security?
  • When the Lawyer Is Breaking Bad
  • Will Investors Have an Appetite for Semi-Annual Reporting?
  • Special Forces Trading on Insider Knowledge
  • Prediction Markets and Compliance Programs
  • The One with the Line That Goes Straight Up and Right
  • The One with the Crypto Paying for a Mega-Shilling Package

Fight Cancer

Please support my Pan-Mass Challenge
Make a donation to fight cancer. donate.pmc.org/DC0176
pan-mass challenge badge

I am a lawyer, but I am not your lawyer. Since I’m a lawyer, this website may be considered attorney advertising under the ethical rules of certain jurisdictions. Please read my disclaimers page before taking any action. And then, don't take any action based on what I wrote.

Creative Commons logo with the text 'Some Rights Reserved' and three symbols representing attribution, non-commercial use, and share alike.

Compliance Building - by Doug Cornelius is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.